rs142415050

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_030665.4(RAI1):c.3650G>A(p.Arg1217Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000978 in 1,611,990 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1217W) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00068 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RAI1
NM_030665.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.48

Publications

6 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

RAI1 (HGNC:9834): (retinoic acid induced 1) This gene is located within the Smith-Magenis syndrome region on chromosome 17. It is highly similar to its mouse counterpart and is expressed at high levels mainly in neuronal tissues. The protein encoded by this gene includes a polymorphic polyglutamine tract in the N-terminal domain. Expression of the mouse counterpart in neurons is induced by retinoic acid. This gene is associated with both the severity of the phenotype and the response to medication in schizophrenic patients. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RAI1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Smith-Magenis syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Potocki-Lupski syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

RAI1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.006658286).

BP6

Variant 17-17796598-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-17796598-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 167562.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000683 (104/152306) while in subpopulation SAS AF = 0.0027 (13/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00159. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 50 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 104 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RAI1	NM_030665.4 link	c.3650G>A	p.Arg1217Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 6	ENST00000353383.6	NP_109590.3	Q7Z5J4-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RAI1	ENST00000353383.6 link	c.3650G>A	p.Arg1217Gln	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 6	1	NM_030665.4	ENSP00000323074.4		Q7Z5J4-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000683

AC:

104

AN:

152188

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00269

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00101

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00191

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000602

AC:

150

AN:

249046

AF XY:

0.000645

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000248

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000547

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000796

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000654

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00101

AC:

1473

AN:

1459684

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00101

AC XY:

736

AN XY:

726092

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000239

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000224

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000504

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00146

AC:

126

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

51334

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000867

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00116

AC:

1286

AN:

1111914

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000596

AC:

AN:

60374

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.482

Heterozygous variant carriers

114

228

341

455

569

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

104

156

208

260

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000683

AC:

104

AN:

152306

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000671

AC XY:

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000361

AC:

AN:

41562

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00270

AC:

AN:

4822

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10622

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00101

AC:

AN:

68018

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00189

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.497

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000473

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000521

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00108

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000930

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000577

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000654

EpiControl

AF:

0.000593

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:10

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:4

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 17, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

RAI1: BP4, BS1, BS2 -

not specified

Benign:2

Dec 16, 2014

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 03, 2014

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Smith-Magenis syndrome

Benign:2

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 07, 2022

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Mar 31, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

RAI1-related disorder

Benign:1

Aug 26, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.11

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.20

BayesDel_noAF

Uncertain

-0.080

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.087

T;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.16

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.060

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.71

LIST_S2

Benign

0.81

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.021

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0067

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.89

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.4

L;.

PhyloP100

3.5

PrimateAI

Benign

0.43

PROVEAN

Benign

0.0

N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.26

Sift

Benign

0.033

D;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.31

T;.

Polyphen

0.076

B;.

Vest4

0.73

MVP

0.82

MPC

0.33

ClinPred

0.015

GERP RS

3.1

Varity_R

0.068

gMVP

0.30

Mutation Taster

=28/72

disease causing

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over