rs142415337
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_005267.5(GJA8):c.385G>A(p.Val129Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0012 in 1,614,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005267.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | NM_005267.5 | c.385G>A | p.Val129Ile | missense_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000369235.2 | NP_005258.2 | |
GJA8 | XM_011509417.3 | c.385G>A | p.Val129Ile | missense_variant | 1/2 | XP_011507719.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJA8 | ENST00000369235.2 | c.385G>A | p.Val129Ile | missense_variant | 2/2 | 6 | NM_005267.5 | ENSP00000358238.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000677 AC: 103AN: 152210Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000816 AC: 205AN: 251334Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000846 AC XY: 115AN XY: 135862
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00125 AC: 1833AN: 1461874Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00124 AC XY: 900AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000676 AC: 103AN: 152328Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000644 AC XY: 48AN XY: 74492
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Cataract 1 multiple types Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 09, 2022 | This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 129 of the GJA8 protein (p.Val129Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs142415337, gnomAD 0.1%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with GJA8-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 292466). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The isoleucine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2022 | GJA8: BS1, BS2 - |
Zonular Pulverulent Cataract Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jun 14, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at