Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_007294.4(BRCA1):c.4992C>T(p.Leu1664=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000101 in 1,610,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. L1664L) has been classified as Likely benign.
BRCA1 (HGNC:1100): (BRCA1 DNA repair associated) This gene encodes a 190 kD nuclear phosphoprotein that plays a role in maintaining genomic stability, and it also acts as a tumor suppressor. The BRCA1 gene contains 22 exons spanning about 110 kb of DNA. The encoded protein combines with other tumor suppressors, DNA damage sensors, and signal transducers to form a large multi-subunit protein complex known as the BRCA1-associated genome surveillance complex (BASC). This gene product associates with RNA polymerase II, and through the C-terminal domain, also interacts with histone deacetylase complexes. This protein thus plays a role in transcription, DNA repair of double-stranded breaks, and recombination. Mutations in this gene are responsible for approximately 40% of inherited breast cancers and more than 80% of inherited breast and ovarian cancers. Alternative splicing plays a role in modulating the subcellular localization and physiological function of this gene. Many alternatively spliced transcript variants, some of which are disease-associated mutations, have been described for this gene, but the full-length natures of only some of these variants has been described. A related pseudogene, which is also located on chromosome 17, has been identified. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]
BP4 - Multiple lines of computational evidence suggest no impact on gene or gene product (conservation, evolutionary, splicing impact, etc.)
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.72).
BP6
?
BP6 - Reputable source recently reports variant as benign, but the evidence is not available to the laboratory to perform an independent evaluation
Variant 17-43067690-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-43067690-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 136551.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. Variant chr17-43067690-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chr17-43067690-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
?
BP7 - A synonymous (silent) variant for which splicing prediction algorithms predict no impact to the splice consensus sequence nor the creation of a new splice site AND the nucleotide is not highly conserved
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.281 with no splicing effect.
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Dec 10, 2018
Variant summary: The variant, BRCA1 c.4992C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00016 in 279004 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0015 within the African subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 1.5-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in BRCA1 causing Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer phenotype (0.001), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. The variant, c.4992C>T, has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (Judkins _2005, Fackenthal _2012, Zheng _2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. At least one publication reports experimental evidence evaluating an impact on protein function, but without a conclussive result (Findlay _2018). Six clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
GeneDx
Feb 05, 2014
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Feb 09, 2018
- -
Benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Clinical Genetics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute
-
- -
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
-
- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Oct 19, 2020
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Oct 25, 2023
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Ambry Genetics
Sep 26, 2014
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
curation
Sema4, Sema4
Nov 26, 2020
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health
May 09, 2016
- -
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Benign:2Other:1
not provided, no classification provided
in vitro
Brotman Baty Institute, University of Washington
-
- -
Benign, reviewed by expert panel
curation
Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA)
Jun 29, 2017
Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to alter mRNA splicing (splicing prior 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/) and frequency 0.0012 (African), derived from ExAC (2014-12-17). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Counsyl
Apr 28, 2016
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Jan 24, 2023
- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
Invitae
Jan 30, 2024
- -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome;C2676676:Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 1 Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided
research
King Laboratory, University of Washington
Sep 01, 2019
- -
BRCA1-related condition Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter
clinical testing
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
May 18, 2021
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Malignant tumor of breast Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided
clinical testing
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
-
The BRCA1 p.Leu1664= variant was identified in 17 of 112062 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.00015) from individuals or families with breast cancer (Fackenthal 2012, Judkins 2005). Judkins (2005) performed a large computational study based on the segregation of variants with certain haplogypes to characterize the clinical significance of genetic variants and concluded that the variant was a benign polymorphism. The variant was also identified in dbSBP (ID: rs142459158) as “With Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (as likely benign by Ambry Genetics, Invitae, and Counsyl, and as benign by GeneDx and Baylor Genetics), Clinvitae (4x), and UMD-LSDB (9x as uncertain significance) databases. The variant was not identified in Cosmic, MutDB, LOVD 3.0, BIC Database, ARUP Laboratories, Zhejiang Colon Cancer Database, databases. The variant was also identified by our laboratory in 2 individuals with breast cancer. The variant was identified in control databases in 44 of 277010 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.000159 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). The p.Leu1664=variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -