rs1424732031
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points: 11P and 0B. PVS1PM2PP5
The NM_000215.4(JAK3):c.3103delC(p.Leu1035CysfsTer3) variant causes a frameshift change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000385 in 1,557,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Variant results in nonsense mediated mRNA decay.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000215.4 frameshift
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- T-B+ severe combined immunodeficiency due to JAK3 deficiencyInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Pathogenic. The variant received 11 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000215.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JAK3 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.3103delC | p.Leu1035CysfsTer3 | frameshift | Exon 23 of 24 | ENSP00000391676.1 | P52333-1 | ||
| JAK3 | TSL:1 | c.3103delC | p.Leu1035CysfsTer3 | frameshift | Exon 22 of 23 | ENSP00000432511.1 | P52333-1 | ||
| JAK3 | TSL:1 | c.3103delC | p.Leu1035CysfsTer3 | frameshift | Exon 23 of 23 | ENSP00000436421.1 | P52333-2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000213 AC: 3AN: 1405870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000288 AC XY: 2AN XY: 695618 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000198 AC: 3AN: 151160Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000406 AC XY: 3AN XY: 73838 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at