rs142498771

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2

This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.394G>A (p.Val132Ile) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 04/24/2023) LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA168677/MONDO:0100488/007

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CDH1
ENST00000261769.10 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Likely benign reviewed by expert panel U:3B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.01
Variant links:
Genes affected
CDH1 (HGNC:1748): (cadherin 1) This gene encodes a classical cadherin of the cadherin superfamily. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants, at least one of which encodes a preproprotein that is proteolytically processed to generate the mature glycoprotein. This calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion protein is comprised of five extracellular cadherin repeats, a transmembrane region and a highly conserved cytoplasmic tail. Mutations in this gene are correlated with gastric, breast, colorectal, thyroid and ovarian cancer. Loss of function of this gene is thought to contribute to cancer progression by increasing proliferation, invasion, and/or metastasis. The ectodomain of this protein mediates bacterial adhesion to mammalian cells and the cytoplasmic domain is required for internalization. This gene is present in a gene cluster with other members of the cadherin family on chromosome 16. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

BS2
For more information check the summary or visit ClinGen Evidence Repository.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
CDH1NM_004360.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.394G>A p.Val132Ile missense_variant 4/16 ENST00000261769.10 NP_004351.1
CDH1NM_001317184.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.394G>A p.Val132Ile missense_variant 4/15 NP_001304113.1
CDH1NM_001317185.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1222G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 4/16 NP_001304114.1
CDH1NM_001317186.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-1426G>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 4/15 NP_001304115.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
CDH1ENST00000261769.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.394G>A p.Val132Ile missense_variant 4/161 NM_004360.5 ENSP00000261769 P1P12830-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152040
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000459
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000656
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000318
AC:
8
AN:
251326
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000368
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
135844
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000308
AC:
45
AN:
1461864
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000358
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000418
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000198
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000138
AC:
21
AN:
152158
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74366
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.0000966
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000181
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:8
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hereditary diffuse gastric adenocarcinoma Uncertain:2Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMyriad Genetics, Inc.Mar 06, 2023This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance as there is insufficient evidence to determine its impact on protein function and/or cancer risk. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 30, 2024- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCounsylNov 11, 2016- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4May 31, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 12, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthApr 22, 2016- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 03, 2020In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Observed in individuals with breast or colorectal cancer (Tung 2015, Yurgelun 2017); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 28135145, 25186627) -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoNov 11, 2022- -
CDH1-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesMay 14, 2024The CDH1 c.394G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Val132Ile. This variant has been identified in an individual with breast cancer (Supplementary data, Tung et al. 2015. PubMed ID: 25186627), as well as in an individual with colorectal cancer (Table A4, Yurgelun et al. 2017. PubMed ID: 28135145). This variant is reported in 0.048% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD and has conflicting interpretations regarding its pathogenicity in ClinVar, ranging from benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/142546/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJun 16, 2020Variant summary: CDH1 c.394G>A (p.Val132Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 5.3e-05 in 282708 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.00048 within the African or African-American subpopulation in the gnomAD database. The observed variant frequency within African or African-American control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 23 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CDH1 causing Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome phenotype (2.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African or African-American origin. c.394G>A has been reported in the literature in sequencing studies of individuals affected with breast cancer and colorectal cancer (example, Tung_2015, Yurgelun_2017). These report(s) do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Hereditary Breast And Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. Multiple laboratories reported the variant with conflicting assessments (benign, n=1; likely benign, n=3; VUS, n=3) with an emerging consensus towards a benign outcome since its previous evaluation. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was re-classified as benign. -
CDH1-related diffuse gastric and lobular breast cancer syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen CDH1 Variant Curation Expert PanelAug 03, 2023The NM_004360.5(CDH1):c.394G>A (p.Val132Ile) variant has been observed in >10 individuals without a diagnosis of diffuse gastric cancer, signet ring tumor or lobular breast cancer and whose family histories do not suggest HDGC (BS2; internal laboratory contributors). In summary, the clinical significance of this variant is classified as likely benign based on BS2 alone. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel: BS2. (CDH1 VCEP specifications version 3.1; 04/24/2023) -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.070
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.55
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.66
CADD
Benign
0.024
DANN
Benign
0.56
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.29
T;T;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.5
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.7
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.040
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.72
T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.020
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.054
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;.;.;.;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.26
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.10
N;.;.;.;N
REVEL
Benign
0.051
Sift
Benign
0.23
T;.;.;.;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.32
B;.;.;.;.
Vest4
0.056
MVP
0.36
MPC
0.21
ClinPred
0.041
T
GERP RS
-11
Varity_R
0.040
gMVP
0.061

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142498771; hg19: chr16-68842333; COSMIC: COSV55728129; COSMIC: COSV55728129; API