rs142576987
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_003331.5(TYK2):c.1559G>A(p.Gly520Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000159 in 1,614,038 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003331.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- immunodeficiency 35Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_003331.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TYK2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1559G>A | p.Gly520Asp | missense | Exon 11 of 25 | ENSP00000431885.1 | P29597 | ||
| TYK2 | TSL:1 | c.1004G>A | p.Gly335Asp | missense | Exon 7 of 21 | ENSP00000433203.1 | E9PM19 | ||
| TYK2 | TSL:4 | c.1559G>A | p.Gly520Asp | missense | Exon 11 of 25 | ENSP00000436175.2 | P29597 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152216Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000104 AC: 26AN: 250152 AF XY: 0.0000812 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000165 AC: 241AN: 1461704Hom.: 0 Cov.: 40 AF XY: 0.000150 AC XY: 109AN XY: 727178 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152334Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000805 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74498 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at