rs142598041
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001127178.3(PIGG):c.2086G>A(p.Glu696Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000123 in 1,613,938 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E696D) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001127178.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 53Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000183 AC: 46AN: 250706 AF XY: 0.000177 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000120 AC: 175AN: 1461864Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000106 AC XY: 77AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000151 AC: 23AN: 152074Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000135 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74274 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
- -
Intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 53 Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 696 of the PIGG protein (p.Glu696Lys). This variant is present in population databases (rs142598041, gnomAD 0.03%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PIGG-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 476330). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is expected to disrupt PIGG protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -
PIGG-related disorder Uncertain:1
The PIGG c.2086G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu696Lys. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.025% of alleles in individuals of Latino descent in gnomAD. A variant affecting the same amino acid (c.2088G>C; p.Glu696Asp) has been reported in the compound heterozygous state with a second variant in the gene (c.2041C>T; p.Arg681Trp) in a patient with PIGG-related neurodevelopmental disease (Tremblay-Laganiere et al. 2021. PubMed ID: 34113002). At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at