Menu
GeneBe

rs142639223

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1702G>A(p.Val568Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000265 in 1,613,860 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V568L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00024 ( 0 hom., cov: 30)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00027 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 missense

Scores

19

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 3.08
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015302777).
BP6
Variant 10-18539443-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539443-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 190717.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=4}.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd at 36 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
CACNB2NM_201596.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1702G>A p.Val568Ile missense_variant 14/14 ENST00000324631.13
CACNB2NM_201590.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1540G>A p.Val514Ile missense_variant 13/13 ENST00000377329.10

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
CACNB2ENST00000324631.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1702G>A p.Val568Ile missense_variant 14/141 NM_201596.3 Q08289-1
CACNB2ENST00000377329.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.1540G>A p.Val514Ile missense_variant 13/131 NM_201590.3 Q08289-3
ENST00000425669.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.377-144C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152002
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000590
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000243
AC:
61
AN:
251242
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000236
AC XY:
32
AN XY:
135826
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000491
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000291
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00114
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000268
AC:
392
AN:
1461858
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
0.000243
AC XY:
177
AN XY:
727230
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000559
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000696
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000237
AC:
36
AN:
152002
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000175
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
74224
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000590
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000959
Alfa
AF:
0.000242
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000446
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ALSPAC
AF:
0.000519
AC:
2
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000581
AC:
5
ExAC
AF:
0.000214
AC:
26
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000415

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Brugada syndrome 4 Uncertain:3
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinDec 15, 2021ACMG classification criteria: BP4 supporting -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJan 04, 2021The CACNB2 c.1540G>A; p.Val514Ile variant (rs142639223), to our knowledge, is not reported in the medical literature but is reported in ClinVar (Variation ID: 190717). This variant is found in the general population with an overall allele frequency of 0.02% (62/282604 alleles) in the Genome Aggregation Database. The valine at codon 514 is moderately conserved, but computational analyses are uncertain whether this variant is neutral or deleterious (REVEL: 0.16). Due to limited information, the clinical significance of the p.Val514Ile variant is uncertain at this time. Gene statement: Although variants in CACNB2 have been associated with Brugada syndrome 4 (MIM: 611876), the evidence supporting this association is limited (Hosseini 2018). Hosseini et al. Reappraisal of Reported Genes for Sudden Arrhythmic Death: Evidence-Based Evaluation of Gene Validity for Brugada Syndrome Circulation, 2018 Sep 18;138(12):1195-1205. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 26, 2024This sequence change replaces valine, which is neutral and non-polar, with isoleucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 514 of the CACNB2 protein (p.Val514Ile). This variant is present in population databases (rs142639223, gnomAD 0.06%), and has an allele count higher than expected for a pathogenic variant. This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with Brugada syndrome (PMID: 25650408). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 190717). Advanced modeling of protein sequence and biophysical properties (such as structural, functional, and spatial information, amino acid conservation, physicochemical variation, residue mobility, and thermodynamic stability) performed at Invitae indicates that this missense variant is not expected to disrupt CACNB2 protein function with a negative predictive value of 80%. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxFeb 07, 2023Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Variants in candidate genes are classified as variants of uncertain significance in accordance with ACMG guidelines (Richards et al., 2015); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 26582918) -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMar 27, 2023Variant summary: CACNB2 c.1540G>A (p.Val514Ile) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Five of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00024 in 251242 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The observed variant frequency is approximately 78-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in CACNB2 causing Brugada Syndrome phenotype (3.1e-06), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. c.1540G>A has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Brugada Syndrome, without strong evidence for causality (Le Scouarnec_2015). Therefore, this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Brugada Syndrome. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Six submitters have provided clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and classified the variant as either VUS (n=4) or likely benign (n=2). Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoMar 14, 2017- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 08, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.064
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.39
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
Cadd
Benign
14
Dann
Benign
0.89
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.061
T;.;T;.;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-1.1
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.97
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.10
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.75
T;T;T;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.023
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.92
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.0
N;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.21
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.33
N;N;N;.;.;N;.;.;N;N;N;.;N;.
REVEL
Benign
0.16
Sift
Benign
0.39
T;T;T;.;.;T;.;.;T;T;T;.;T;.
Sift4G
Benign
0.49
T;T;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.
Polyphen
0.0010
B;B;P;.;.;B;.;.;.;B;B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.026
MVP
0.56
MPC
0.16
ClinPred
0.010
T
GERP RS
4.0
Varity_R
0.036
gMVP
0.046

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142639223; hg19: chr10-18828372; API