rs142647321
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001130823.3(DNMT1):āc.4428T>Gā(p.His1476Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0027 in 1,610,694 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 15 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001130823.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNMT1 | NM_001130823.3 | c.4428T>G | p.His1476Gln | missense_variant | 37/41 | ENST00000359526.9 | NP_001124295.1 | |
DNMT1 | NM_001318730.2 | c.4380T>G | p.His1460Gln | missense_variant | 36/40 | NP_001305659.1 | ||
DNMT1 | NM_001379.4 | c.4380T>G | p.His1460Gln | missense_variant | 36/40 | NP_001370.1 | ||
DNMT1 | NM_001318731.2 | c.4065T>G | p.His1355Gln | missense_variant | 37/41 | NP_001305660.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00249 AC: 379AN: 152156Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00245 AC: 592AN: 241292Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00242 AC XY: 318AN XY: 131148
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00272 AC: 3962AN: 1458420Hom.: 14 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00267 AC XY: 1937AN XY: 725248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00249 AC: 379AN: 152274Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00249 AC XY: 185AN XY: 74446
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | DNMT1: BP4, BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | May 06, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 04, 2019 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Apr 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genomic Diagnostic Laboratory, Division of Genomic Diagnostics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | Apr 17, 2015 | - - |
Hereditary sensory neuropathy-deafness-dementia syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
DNMT1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 13, 2024 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jan 18, 2020 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at