rs142658052

Variant names:

Your query was ambiguous. Multiple possible variants found:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.969T>G(p.Leu323Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000117 in 1,613,716 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000096 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PIGO
NM_032634.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.58

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PIGO (HGNC:23215): (phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class O) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis. The GPI-anchor is a glycolipid which contains three mannose molecules in its core backbone. The GPI-anchor is found on many blood cells and serves to anchor proteins to the cell surface. This protein is involved in the transfer of ethanolaminephosphate (EtNP) to the third mannose in GPI. At least three alternatively spliced transcripts encoding two distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

PIGO Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hyperphosphatasia with intellectual disability syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
hyperphosphatasia-intellectual disability syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PIGO links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).

BP6

Variant 9-35093180-A-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-35093180-A-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 385746.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.58 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.0000965 (141/1461360) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00555 (32/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00404. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 59 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PIGO	NM_032634.4 link	c.969T>G	p.Leu323Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 11	ENST00000378617.4	NP_116023.2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PIGO	ENST00000378617.4 link	c.969T>G	p.Leu323Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 11	1	NM_032634.4	ENSP00000367880.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000309

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000844

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000327

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000143

AC:

AN:

250878

AF XY:

0.0000959

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000800

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000232

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000106

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000327

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000965

AC:

141

AN:

1461360

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000812

AC XY:

AN XY:

726890

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00111

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000246

AC:

AN:

44696

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26126

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39688

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000232

AC:

AN:

86246

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53410

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00555

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000351

AC:

AN:

1111584

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

60368

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000362

AC XY:

AN XY:

74506

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

41580

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000327

AC:

AN:

15312

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10626

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.487

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000131

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000359

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hyperphosphatasia with intellectual disability syndrome 2

Uncertain:1Benign:2

Dec 19, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 13, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jun 03, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.58

CADD

Benign

4.9

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

1.6

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over