rs143040393
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The NM_024422.6(DSC2):c.1789G>T(p.Val597Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000917 in 1,614,014 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_024422.6 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSC2 | NM_024422.6 | c.1789G>T | p.Val597Phe | missense_variant | 12/16 | ENST00000280904.11 | |
DSC2 | NM_004949.5 | c.1789G>T | p.Val597Phe | missense_variant | 12/17 | ||
DSC2 | NM_001406506.1 | c.1360G>T | p.Val454Phe | missense_variant | 12/16 | ||
DSC2 | NM_001406507.1 | c.1360G>T | p.Val454Phe | missense_variant | 12/17 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSC2 | ENST00000280904.11 | c.1789G>T | p.Val597Phe | missense_variant | 12/16 | 1 | NM_024422.6 | P1 | |
DSC2 | ENST00000251081.8 | c.1789G>T | p.Val597Phe | missense_variant | 12/17 | 1 | |||
DSC2 | ENST00000648081.1 | c.1360G>T | p.Val454Phe | missense_variant | 13/17 | ||||
DSC2 | ENST00000682357.1 | c.1360G>T | p.Val454Phe | missense_variant | 12/16 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.000579 AC: 88AN: 152108Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000155 AC: 39AN: 251108Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000111 AC XY: 15AN XY: 135720
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000404 AC: 59AN: 1461788Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000358 AC XY: 26AN XY: 727188
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.000585 AC: 89AN: 152226Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000470 AC XY: 35AN XY: 74406
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Oct 19, 2019 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 31, 2017 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 11 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Mar 07, 2019 | - - |
DSC2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 20, 2023 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Mar 04, 2019 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at