rs143043662
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_002230.4(JUP):c.1942G>A(p.Val648Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0106 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 113 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0072 ( 4 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.011 ( 109 hom. )
Consequence
JUP
NM_002230.4 missense
NM_002230.4 missense
Scores
2
3
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 7.63
Genes affected
JUP (HGNC:6207): (junction plakoglobin) This gene encodes a major cytoplasmic protein which is the only known constituent common to submembranous plaques of both desmosomes and intermediate junctions. This protein forms distinct complexes with cadherins and desmosomal cadherins and is a member of the catenin family since it contains a distinct repeating amino acid motif called the armadillo repeat. Mutation in this gene has been associated with Naxos disease. Alternative splicing occurs in this gene; however, not all transcripts have been fully described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.012058109).
BP6
Variant 17-41757519-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-41757519-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 45842.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=10}. Variant chr17-41757519-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr17-41757519-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00723 (1101/152270) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0121 (822/68008). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0114. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 518 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 4 AD,AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUP | NM_002230.4 | c.1942G>A | p.Val648Ile | missense_variant | 12/14 | ENST00000393931.8 | NP_002221.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JUP | ENST00000393931.8 | c.1942G>A | p.Val648Ile | missense_variant | 12/14 | 1 | NM_002230.4 | ENSP00000377508.3 | ||
JUP | ENST00000310706.9 | c.1942G>A | p.Val648Ile | missense_variant | 12/15 | 1 | ENSP00000311113.5 | |||
JUP | ENST00000393930.5 | c.1942G>A | p.Val648Ile | missense_variant | 12/15 | 5 | ENSP00000377507.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00724 AC: 1101AN: 152152Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
1101
AN:
152152
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00719 AC: 1807AN: 251466Hom.: 16 AF XY: 0.00703 AC XY: 956AN XY: 135918
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1807
AN:
251466
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
956
AN XY:
135918
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0109 AC: 16002AN: 1461878Hom.: 109 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.0106 AC XY: 7688AN XY: 727244
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
16002
AN:
1461878
Hom.:
Cov.:
38
AF XY:
AC XY:
7688
AN XY:
727244
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00723 AC: 1101AN: 152270Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00696 AC XY: 518AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
1101
AN:
152270
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
518
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
TwinsUK
AF:
AC:
53
ALSPAC
AF:
AC:
55
ESP6500AA
AF:
AC:
11
ESP6500EA
AF:
AC:
77
ExAC
AF:
AC:
902
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
10
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:19
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute | Mar 28, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Nov 20, 2014 | p.Val648Ile in exon 12 of JUP: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.4% (98/6744) of European (Finnish) chromosomes and 1.1% (760/67702) of European (Non-Finnish) chromosomes by the E xome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs14304 3662). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | research | Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health | Jun 24, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
not provided Benign:6
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Mar 17, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24704780) - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Aug 01, 2024 | JUP: BS1, BS2 - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 27, 2022 | - - |
Naxos disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Nov 12, 2018 | - - |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Mar 22, 2018 | - - |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 11, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Naxos disease;C1969081:Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 12 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Uncertain
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;T;T
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
.;.;D
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
L;L;L
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T;T
Polyphen
B;B;B
Vest4
MVP
MPC
0.53
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at