rs143054357
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP6BS2_Supporting
The NM_000552.5(VWF):c.546G>A(p.Ser182Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00145 in 1,614,110 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152130Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00124 AC: 312AN: 251476 AF XY: 0.00127 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00148 AC: 2159AN: 1461862Hom.: 6 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00145 AC XY: 1053AN XY: 727232 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00122 AC: 186AN: 152248Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 90AN XY: 74438 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
Observed with a variant on the opposite allele (in trans) in a patient with type 1 von Willebrand disease (VWD) in the published literature (Borrs et al., 2019), and observed with a variant in cis and a variant in trans in a patient with type 3 VWD in the published literature (Corrales et al., 2009; Borrs et al., 2019); Published functional studies demonstrate a damaging effect by affect splicing of VWF mRNA (Borrs et al., 2019); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 19277422, 36307006, 34708896, 30361419) -
- -
- -
not specified Benign:2
- -
- -
von Willebrand disease type 2 Uncertain:1
- -
von Willebrand disease type 1 Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at