rs143155251
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting
The NM_015340.4(LARS2):c.1947C>A(p.Asp649Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000706 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_015340.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hydrops-lactic acidosis-sideroblastic anemia-multisystemic failure syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- Perrault syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Perrault syndrome 4Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000358 AC: 9AN: 251472 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000561 AC: 82AN: 1461870Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000605 AC XY: 44AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000210 AC: 32AN: 152266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000201 AC XY: 15AN XY: 74456 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:3
Observed in a patient with suspected mitochondrial disease in published literature (Nogueira et al., 2019); however, this patient did not have hearing loss; In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports a deleterious effect; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 30831263) -
- -
This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with glutamic acid, which is acidic and polar, at codon 649 of the LARS2 protein (p.Asp649Glu). This variant is present in population databases (rs143155251, gnomAD 0.05%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with mitochondrial disease (PMID: 30831263). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 504797). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The glutamic acid amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.1947C>A (p.D649E) alteration is located in exon 17 (coding exon 15) of the LARS2 gene. This alteration results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 1947, causing the aspartic acid (D) at amino acid position 649 to be replaced by a glutamic acid (E). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
not specified Benign:1
p.Asp649Glu in exon 17 of LARS2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance due to a lack of conservation across species, including mammals. Of note, >5 mammals have a glutamic acid (Glu) at this position despite high nearby amino acid conservation. In addition, computational prediction tools do not sug gest a high likelihood of impact to the protein. This variant has been identifie d in 4/66738 European chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, htt p://exac.broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs143155251). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at