rs143168379
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM5BP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3413G>A(p.Arg1138Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000459 in 1,612,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1138?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000799 AC: 20AN: 250386Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000958 AC XY: 13AN XY: 135692
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000466 AC: 68AN: 1460596Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000606 AC XY: 44AN XY: 726590
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000394 AC: 6AN: 152228Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000538 AC XY: 4AN XY: 74372
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
- -
- -
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
not provided Benign:1
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327) -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
not specified Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at