rs143177272
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points: 5P and 0B. PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_005609.4(PYGM):c.2446C>T(p.Arg816Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000991 in 1,614,036 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a damaging outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R816H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005609.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- glycogen storage disease VInheritance: AR, AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 5 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005609.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYGM | NM_005609.4 | MANE Select | c.2446C>T | p.Arg816Cys | missense | Exon 20 of 20 | NP_005600.1 | ||
| PYGM | NM_001164716.1 | c.2182C>T | p.Arg728Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 18 | NP_001158188.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PYGM | ENST00000164139.4 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2446C>T | p.Arg816Cys | missense | Exon 20 of 20 | ENSP00000164139.3 | ||
| PYGM | ENST00000377432.7 | TSL:2 | c.2182C>T | p.Arg728Cys | missense | Exon 18 of 18 | ENSP00000366650.3 | ||
| PYGM | ENST00000483742.1 | TSL:2 | n.1799C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000477 AC: 12AN: 251484 AF XY: 0.0000515 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000985 AC: 144AN: 1461892Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000102 AC XY: 74AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000105 AC: 16AN: 152144Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000942 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74322 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Glycogen storage disease, type V Uncertain:2
This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, at codon 816 of the PYGM protein (p.Arg816Cys). This variant is present in population databases (rs143177272, gnomAD 0.009%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with PYGM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 281389). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Not Available"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Not Available"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance.
Tip-toe gait Pathogenic:1
Toe Walking has various causes, ranging from idiopathic or habitual reasons to an underlying neuromuscular disease. The most observed form of toe walking is idiopathic toe walking (ITW) - a diagnosis of exclusion. ITW occurs in about 5% of children after their second birthday and is a common problem in pediatric orthopedics. In about 70% of these cases, there is spontaneous remission within six months of the onset of ITW. If the toe walk persists, one can assume the presence of a non-idiopathic form of toe walk (n-ITW). In n-ITW, the causes of the abnormal gait are neurological or myogenic. Differential diagnoses such as infantile cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, spinal amyotrophy and hereditary motor-sensory neuropathy as well as rare metabolic disorders of the musculature must be considered (Pomarino et al., 2018). In our clinical ITW consultation, we screen children with n-ITW for a genetic form of tiptoe gait using next generation sequencing for gene variants in 49 genes. These are genes in which gene variants can lead to neuromuscular diseases in which an association with toe-tapping gait has been reported or can be suspected due to patients’ clinical symptoms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in which several patients with toe walking displayed heterozygosity for pathogenic or likely pathogenic PYGM mutations and mild symptoms of the metabolic muscle disease McArdle. The findings of our research are in line with recently published observations in heterozygous family members patients with McArdle disease. We should mention that some of the patients in our cohort harbored heterozygous variants in other genes of our gene panel. However, the numbers in this study were too small to workout any resulting combined genetic effects. It is concluded that genetic conditions can contribute to the development of toe walking. Apparently, even a slight genetic weakening of the muscles can lead to changes to the gait pattern. Future studies must show how the pathomechanism can be explained for the PYGM variants and whether there are new therapeutic approaches to be developed based on this research.
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
The c.2446C>T (p.R816C) alteration is located in exon 20 (coding exon 20) of the PYGM gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 2446, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 816 to be replaced by a cysteine (C). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear.
not provided Uncertain:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at