rs143186319

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_080680.3(COL11A2):​c.4458T>A​(p.Gly1486=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0026 in 1,613,790 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1486G) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0023 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0026 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

COL11A2
NM_080680.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.28
Variant links:
Genes affected
COL11A2 (HGNC:2187): (collagen type XI alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes one of the two alpha chains of type XI collagen, a minor fibrillar collagen. It is located on chromosome 6 very close to but separate from the gene for retinoid X receptor beta. Type XI collagen is a heterotrimer but the third alpha chain is a post-translationally modified alpha 1 type II chain. Proteolytic processing of this type XI chain produces PARP, a proline/arginine-rich protein that is an amino terminal domain. Mutations in this gene are associated with type III Stickler syndrome, otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia (OSMED syndrome), Weissenbacher-Zweymuller syndrome, autosomal dominant non-syndromic sensorineural type 13 deafness (DFNA13), and autosomal recessive non-syndromic sensorineural type 53 deafness (DFNB53). Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. A related pseudogene is located nearby on chromosome 6. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 6-33165955-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-33165955-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 178322.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr6-33165955-A-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.28 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00226 (343/152024) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0103 (53/5152). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00808. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 178 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
COL11A2NM_080680.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.4458T>A p.Gly1486= synonymous_variant 62/66 ENST00000341947.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
COL11A2ENST00000341947.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.4458T>A p.Gly1486= synonymous_variant 62/665 NM_080680.3 P4
COL11A2ENST00000374708.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.4200T>A p.Gly1400= synonymous_variant 60/645 A1
COL11A2ENST00000683572.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.264T>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant 5/9
COL11A2ENST00000477772.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.273-139T>A intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant 2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00227
AC:
345
AN:
151906
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000605
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00283
AC:
706
AN:
249318
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00293
AC XY:
396
AN XY:
135104
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000631
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00249
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000999
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0105
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00245
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000742
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00257
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00442
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00264
AC:
3853
AN:
1461766
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.00268
AC XY:
1946
AN XY:
727190
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000508
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00373
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.000689
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0139
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00247
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00120
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00237
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00305
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00226
AC:
343
AN:
152024
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00239
AC XY:
178
AN XY:
74324
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000603
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00301
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.000577
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0103
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000850
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00272
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00378
Alfa
AF:
0.00248
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00222
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00953
AC:
33
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00196
EpiControl
AF:
0.00267

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineDec 19, 2014p.Gly1486Gly in exon 62 of COL11A2: This variant is not expected to have clinica l significance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located w ithin the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 1.2% (103/8668) of East Asian chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac .broadinstitute.org; dbSNP rs143186319). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 03, 2017This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2023COL11A2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesSep 06, 2023- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Otospondylomegaepiphyseal dysplasia, autosomal recessive Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Fibrochondrogenesis 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Stickler Syndrome, Dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJun 14, 2016- -
Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenDec 22, 2021- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.71

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143186319; hg19: chr6-33133732; API