rs143189394

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_170707.4(LMNA):​c.1851C>T​(p.Ala617=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000244 in 1,613,546 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00011 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LMNA
NM_170707.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:13

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.187
Variant links:
Genes affected
LMNA (HGNC:6636): (lamin A/C) The protein encoded by this gene is part of the nuclear lamina, a two-dimensional matrix of proteins located next to the inner nuclear membrane. The lamin family of proteins make up the matrix and are highly conserved in evolution. During mitosis, the lamina matrix is reversibly disassembled as the lamin proteins are phosphorylated. Lamin proteins are thought to be involved in nuclear stability, chromatin structure and gene expression. Vertebrate lamins consist of two types, A and B. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. Mutations in this gene lead to several diseases: Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, familial partial lipodystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, dilated cardiomyopathy, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.35).
BP6
Variant 1-156138640-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-156138640-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 48054.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Benign=8, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr1-156138640-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.187 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00148 (226/152368) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00536 (223/41586). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00479. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 100 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
LMNANM_170707.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.1851C>T p.Ala617= synonymous_variant 11/12 ENST00000368300.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
LMNAENST00000368300.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1851C>T p.Ala617= synonymous_variant 11/121 NM_170707.4 P1P02545-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00148
AC:
226
AN:
152250
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00538
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000290
AC:
72
AN:
248286
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000215
AC XY:
29
AN XY:
134802
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00440
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000581
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000114
AC:
167
AN:
1461178
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000949
AC XY:
69
AN XY:
726884
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00433
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000134
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000265
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00148
AC:
226
AN:
152368
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00134
AC XY:
100
AN XY:
74516
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00536
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00116
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00168
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:13
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:5
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoFeb 08, 2013- -
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpMay 29, 2018Variant summary: LMNA c.1851C>T alters a non-conserved nucleotide resulting in a synonymous change. 5/5 computational tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant is found at a frequency of 0.000448 in the gnomAD database, but was observed predominantly in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.005139. The observed variant frequency within African control individuals in the gnomAD database is more than 20 fold above the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in LMNA causing Cardiomyopathy phenotype (0.005139 vs. 0.00025), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of African origin. c.1851C>T has been reported in the literature, however this report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Cardiomyopathy. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 and all classified the variant as benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineFeb 09, 2012Ala617Ala in exon 11 of LMNA: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.4% (16/3738) African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project in a broad population (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs143189394). -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 16, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Jul 27, 2016- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOct 09, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingColor Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color HealthMar 23, 2018- -
not provided Benign:2
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenApr 01, 2024LMNA: BP4, BP7 -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingMolecular Genetics Laboratory, London Health Sciences Centre-- -
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 29, 2024- -
Primary dilated cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAll of Us Research Program, National Institutes of HealthFeb 05, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 20, 2019This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.35
CADD
Benign
14
DANN
Benign
0.91

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.15
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143189394; hg19: chr1-156108431; API