rs143215183

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_018076.5(ODAD2):ā€‹c.883G>Cā€‹(p.Val295Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00168 in 1,534,874 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.0017 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

ODAD2
NM_018076.5 missense

Scores

7
12

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
ODAD2 (HGNC:25583): (outer dynein arm docking complex subunit 2) The protein encoded by this gene contains ten Armadillo repeat motifs (ARMs) and one HEAT repeat, and is thought to be involved in ciliary and flagellar movement. This protein has been shown to localize to the ciliary axonemes and at the ciliary base of respiratory cells. Studies indicate that mutations in this gene cause partial outer dynein arm (ODA) defects in respiratory cilia. The cilia of cells with mutations in this gene displayed either reduced ciliary beat frequency and amplitude, or, complete immotility. Some individuals with primary ciliary dyskensia (PCD) have been shown to have mutations in this gene. PCD is characterized by chronic airway disease and left/right body asymmetry defects. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2015]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015191466).
BP6
Variant 10-27981519-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-27981519-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 241266.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr10-27981519-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0013 (198/152172) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00212 (144/67992). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00184. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 94 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 5 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
ODAD2NM_018076.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.883G>C p.Val295Leu missense_variant 7/20 ENST00000305242.10 NP_060546.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
ODAD2ENST00000305242.10 linkuse as main transcriptc.883G>C p.Val295Leu missense_variant 7/201 NM_018076.5 ENSP00000306410 P1Q5T2S8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00130
AC:
198
AN:
152054
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00103
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00335
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00154
AC:
282
AN:
182870
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00159
AC XY:
161
AN XY:
101118
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000248
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000747
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00380
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000303
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00235
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00201
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00173
AC:
2388
AN:
1382702
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.00172
AC XY:
1177
AN XY:
685788
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000214
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00116
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00401
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000308
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000493
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00194
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00158
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00130
AC:
198
AN:
152172
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00126
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00105
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00288
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000378
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00212
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00213
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00132
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00108
AC:
4
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
12
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00268
AC:
23
ExAC
AF:
0.00164
AC:
199
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000578
AC:
2
AN:
3472

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia 23 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetics and Molecular Pathology, SA PathologyOct 03, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 22, 2024- -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJun 01, 2016- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsMay 16, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
ODAD2-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 04, 2022This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.16
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.35
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.28
CADD
Benign
16
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.0055
T;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.28
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.24
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.93
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.74
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.028
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.74
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.9
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.6
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.12
Sift
Uncertain
0.011
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.019
D;D
Polyphen
0.93
P;.
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.62
MPC
0.34
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
3.1
Varity_R
0.19
gMVP
0.78

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143215183; hg19: chr10-28270448; API