rs143227762
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_000447.3(PSEN2):c.132T>A(p.Thr44=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000692 in 1,613,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0037 ( 4 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00037 ( 2 hom. )
Consequence
PSEN2
NM_000447.3 synonymous
NM_000447.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -2.34
Genes affected
PSEN2 (HGNC:9509): (presenilin 2) Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients with an inherited form of the disease carry mutations in the presenilin proteins (PSEN1 or PSEN2) or the amyloid precursor protein (APP). These disease-linked mutations result in increased production of the longer form of amyloid-beta (main component of amyloid deposits found in AD brains). Presenilins are postulated to regulate APP processing through their effects on gamma-secretase, an enzyme that cleaves APP. Also, it is thought that the presenilins are involved in the cleavage of the Notch receptor such that, they either directly regulate gamma-secretase activity, or themselves act are protease enzymes. Two alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms of PSEN2 have been identified. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.78).
BP6
?
Variant 1-226882039-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-226882039-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 533780.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-2.34 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00374 (569/152340) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0135 (562/41580). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0126. There are 4 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 259 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High AC in GnomAd at 570 AD gene.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN2 | NM_000447.3 | c.132T>A | p.Thr44= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | ENST00000366783.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSEN2 | ENST00000366783.8 | c.132T>A | p.Thr44= | synonymous_variant | 4/13 | 5 | NM_000447.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00374 AC: 570AN: 152222Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
570
AN:
152222
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00100 AC: 251AN: 250228Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000672 AC XY: 91AN XY: 135504
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
251
AN:
250228
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
91
AN XY:
135504
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000375 AC: 548AN: 1461628Hom.: 2 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.000323 AC XY: 235AN XY: 727120
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
548
AN:
1461628
Hom.:
Cov.:
35
AF XY:
AC XY:
235
AN XY:
727120
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00374 AC: 569AN: 152340Hom.: 4 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00348 AC XY: 259AN XY: 74502
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
569
AN:
152340
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
259
AN XY:
74502
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Alzheimer disease 4 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Nov 14, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1V Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at