rs143326262

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_201596.3(CACNB2):c.1511C>T(p.Thr504Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00277 in 1,614,042 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0017 ( 2 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0029 ( 11 hom. )

Consequence

CACNB2
NM_201596.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.904

Variant links:

Genes affected

CACNB2 (HGNC:1402): (calcium voltage-gated channel auxiliary subunit beta 2) This gene encodes a subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel protein that is a member of the voltage-gated calcium channel superfamily. The gene product was originally identified as an antigen target in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, an autoimmune disorder. Mutations in this gene are associated with Brugada syndrome. Alternatively spliced variants encoding different isoforms have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Feb 2013]

CACNB2 links:

ENSG00000240291 (HGNC:58168):

ENSG00000240291 links:

LOC124902386 (HGNC:):

LOC124902386 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008203387).

BP6

Variant 10-18539252-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-18539252-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 161212.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2, Likely_benign=7, not_provided=1}. Variant chr10-18539252-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr10-18539252-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 253 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CACNB2	NM_201596.3 link	c.1511C>T	p.Thr504Ile	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 14	ENST00000324631.13	NP_963890.2	Q08289-1
CACNB2	NM_201590.3 link	c.1349C>T	p.Thr450Ile	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	ENST00000377329.10	NP_963884.2	Q08289-3

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CACNB2	ENST00000324631.13 link	c.1511C>T	p.Thr504Ile	missense_variant	Exon 14 of 14	1	NM_201596.3	ENSP00000320025.8		Q08289-1
CACNB2	ENST00000377329.10 link	c.1349C>T	p.Thr450Ile	missense_variant	Exon 13 of 13	1	NM_201590.3	ENSP00000366546.4		Q08289-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00166

AC:

253

AN:

152078

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000773

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000787

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00300

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00148

AC:

373

AN:

251302

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00153

AC XY:

208

AN XY:

135838

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000677

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000694

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000298

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00282

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00228

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00288

AC:

4214

AN:

1461846

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00278

AC XY:

2022

AN XY:

727230

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000448

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000961

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000421

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000580

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000374

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00358

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00235

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00166

AC:

253

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00142

AC XY:

106

AN XY:

74418

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000770

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000786

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00300

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00142

Alfa

AF:

0.00308

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00168

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00324

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00415

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00209

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00157

AC:

191

EpiCase

AF:

0.00316

EpiControl

AF:

0.00249

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:12Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:3

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Dec 18, 2017

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The CACNB2 c.1349C>T (p.Thr450Ile) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 3/4 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant (SNPsandGO not captured due to low reliability index). This variant was found in 449/289284 control chromosomes (1 homozygote), predominantly observed in the European (Non-Finnish) subpopulation at a frequency of 0.00279 (353/126520). This frequency is about 893 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic CACNB2 variant (0.0000031), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of European (Non-Finnish) origin. Though this variant has been reported in 2 individuals in a single family with BrS in an early study (Burashnikov 2010), later population studies indicated that the variant is not associated with BrS specific ECG patterns (Risgaard 2013, Ghouse 2017) and one study reports non-segregation of the variant with disease in a family (Allegue_2015). In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as likely benign. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -

Mar 29, 2016

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Only 1 proband in HGMD, ExAC: 0.2% (159/66588) European chromosomes -

not provided

Benign:3Other:1

Jun 24, 2013

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

- -

Oct 17, 2022

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. -

GenomeConnect, ClinGen

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: phenotyping only

Variant classified as Uncertain significance and reported on 11-08-2015 by Lab or GTR ID 26957. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. -

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

CACNB2: BP4, BS2; ENSG00000240291: BS2 -

Brugada syndrome 4

Benign:2

Jun 02, 2017

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Brugada syndrome

Uncertain:1

Jun 01, 2014

CSER _CC_NCGL, University of Washington

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Long QT syndrome

Benign:1

Jan 08, 2024

Dept of Medical Biology, Uskudar University

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: research

Criteria: BS1, BS2 -

CACNB2-related disorder

Benign:1

May 02, 2024

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Cardiovascular phenotype

Benign:1

Feb 11, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ventricular tachycardia

Benign:1

Jan 31, 2019

Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.091

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.35

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.27

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.094

T;.;T;.;.;.;T;T;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.22

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.060

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.90

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.95

D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.037

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0082

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.71

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.90

L;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.32

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.67

N;N;N;.;.;N;.;.;N;N;N;N;.

REVEL

Benign

0.13

Sift

Benign

0.19

T;T;T;.;.;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;.

Sift4G

Benign

0.21

T;T;T;.;.;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;.

Polyphen

0.45

P;B;D;.;.;B;.;.;.;B;B;.;.

Vest4

0.050

MVP

0.88

MPC

0.22

ClinPred

0.011

GERP RS

3.6

Varity_R

0.086

gMVP

0.20

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over