rs143347563

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_005236.3(ERCC4):c.1606G>C(p.Val536Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000366 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000022 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ERCC4
NM_005236.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:2O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.290

Variant links:

Genes affected

ERCC4 (HGNC:3436): (ERCC excision repair 4, endonuclease catalytic subunit) The protein encoded by this gene forms a complex with ERCC1 and is involved in the 5' incision made during nucleotide excision repair. This complex is a structure specific DNA repair endonuclease that interacts with EME1. Defects in this gene are a cause of xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F (XP-F), or xeroderma pigmentosum VI (XP6).[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

ERCC4 links:

ENSG00000262732 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000262732 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007998526).

BP6

Variant 16-13935538-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-13935538-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 134157.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000219 (32/1461884) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.000926 (31/33480). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00067. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 21 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ERCC4	NM_005236.3 link	c.1606G>C	p.Val536Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 11	ENST00000311895.8	NP_005227.1	Q92889-1A0A1W1GSK9
ERCC4	XM_011522424.4 link	c.1744G>C	p.Val582Leu	missense_variant	Exon 9 of 12		XP_011520726.1	A0A804HKF9
ERCC4	XM_047433774.1 link	c.817G>C	p.Val273Leu	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 8		XP_047289730.1
ERCC4	XM_011522427.2 link	c.256G>C	p.Val86Leu	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 6		XP_011520729.1	B4DXD8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
ERCC4	ENST00000311895.8 link	c.1606G>C	p.Val536Leu	missense_variant	Exon 8 of 11	1	NM_005236.3	ENSP00000310520.7		Q92889-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152166

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000627

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000477

AC:

AN:

251386

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000515

AC XY:

AN XY:

135894

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000739

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000219

AC:

AN:

1461884

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000289

AC XY:

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000926

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000177

AC:

AN:

152284

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000121

AC XY:

AN XY:

74454

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000626

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000214

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000268

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00114

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000906

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Fanconi anemia complementation group Q

Uncertain:1

Dec 14, 2023

St. Jude Molecular Pathology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The ERCC4 c.1606G>C (p.Val536Leu) missense change has a maximum subpopulation frequency of 0.072% in gnomAD v2.1.1 (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). The in silico tool REVEL predicts a benign effect on protein function, but this prediction has not been confirmed by functional studies. This variant has not been reported in individuals with Fanconi anemia or xeroderma pigmentosum. In summary, the evidence currently available is insufficient to determine the clinical significance of this variant. It has therefore been classified as of uncertain significance. -

Cockayne syndrome;C0268140:Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F;C3808988:Fanconi anemia complementation group Q

Benign:1

Oct 10, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Xeroderma pigmentosum, group F

Benign:1

May 28, 2019

Mendelics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.060

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.57

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.67

CADD

Benign

2.5

DANN

Benign

0.69

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.088

Eigen

Benign

-1.7

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.7

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.15

LIST_S2

Benign

0.69

M_CAP

Benign

0.012

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0080

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.0

MutationAssessor

Benign

-1.2

PrimateAI

Benign

0.25

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.070

REVEL

Benign

0.038

Sift

Benign

0.72

Sift4G

Benign

0.61

Polyphen

0.0

Vest4

0.042

MutPred

0.27

Gain of helix (P = 0.0854);

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.076

ClinPred

0.017

GERP RS

-9.4

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Varity_R

0.025

gMVP

0.36

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over