rs143367024
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_006528.4(TFPI2):c.682C>T(p.Arg228Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000787 in 1,552,370 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R228Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_006528.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_006528.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TFPI2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.682C>T | p.Arg228Trp | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000222543.5 | P48307-1 | ||
| TFPI2 | c.700C>T | p.Arg234Trp | missense | Exon 5 of 5 | ENSP00000497131.1 | A0A3B3IS67 | |||
| TFPI2 | c.511C>T | p.Arg171Trp | missense | Exon 4 of 4 | ENSP00000568518.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00425 AC: 646AN: 152022Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00109 AC: 211AN: 193072 AF XY: 0.000825 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000410 AC: 574AN: 1400230Hom.: 2 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.000363 AC XY: 253AN XY: 696050 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00425 AC: 647AN: 152140Hom.: 5 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00429 AC XY: 319AN XY: 74382 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at