rs1434598021
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_001039763.4(TMEM232):c.1949T>C(p.Leu650Pro) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000752 in 1,328,950 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L650H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001039763.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001039763.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM232 | NM_001039763.4 | MANE Select | c.1949T>C | p.Leu650Pro | missense | Exon 14 of 14 | NP_001034852.3 | C9JQI7-1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMEM232 | ENST00000455884.7 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.1949T>C | p.Leu650Pro | missense | Exon 14 of 14 | ENSP00000401477.2 | C9JQI7-1 | |
| TMEM232 | ENST00000512003.7 | TSL:1 | n.*1243T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 11 of 11 | ENSP00000427785.2 | E5RG73 | ||
| TMEM232 | ENST00000515518.6 | TSL:1 | n.1621T>C | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 12 of 13 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.52e-7 AC: 1AN: 1328950Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000153 AC XY: 1AN XY: 654804 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at