Menu
GeneBe

rs143495349

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1

The NM_001330078.2(NRXN1):c.4275G>T(p.Arg1425=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000167 in 1,614,128 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R1425R) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00093 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000088 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

NRXN1
NM_001330078.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.243
Variant links:
Genes affected
NRXN1 (HGNC:8008): (neurexin 1) This gene encodes a single-pass type I membrane protein that belongs to the neurexin family. Neurexins are cell-surface receptors that bind neuroligins to form Ca(2+)-dependent neurexin/neuroligin complexes at synapses in the central nervous system. This complex is required for efficient neurotransmission and is involved in the formation of synaptic contacts. Three members of this gene family have been studied in detail and are estimated to generate over 3,000 variants through the use of two alternative promoters (alpha and beta) and extensive alternative splicing in each family member. Recently, a third promoter (gamma) was identified for this gene in the 3' region. Mutations in this gene are associated with Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome-2 and may contribute to susceptibility to schizophrenia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.52).
BP6
Variant 2-49922193-C-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-49922193-C-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 138545.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=3}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.243 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000926 (141/152260) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00303 (126/41534). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0026. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 61 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
NRXN1NM_001330078.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.4275G>T p.Arg1425= synonymous_variant 23/23 ENST00000401669.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
NRXN1ENST00000401669.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.4275G>T p.Arg1425= synonymous_variant 23/235 NM_001330078.2 A1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000920
AC:
140
AN:
152142
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00302
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000720
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000271
AC:
68
AN:
251114
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000192
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
135726
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00388
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000868
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000176
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000876
AC:
128
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000784
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
727236
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00311
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000894
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000182
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000926
AC:
141
AN:
152260
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000820
AC XY:
61
AN XY:
74434
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00303
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000719
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000441
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00112

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoApr 15, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 30, 2013This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Pitt-Hopkins-like syndrome 2 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 27, 2024- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsNov 29, 2018- -
History of neurodevelopmental disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJun 06, 2016Synonymous alterations with insufficient evidence to classify as benign -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.52
Cadd
Benign
4.8
Dann
Benign
0.73

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143495349; hg19: chr2-50149331; API