rs143534021

Positions:

chr19-12813107-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_006397.3(RNASEH2A):c.662A>G(p.Lys221Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000626 in 1,614,168 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00048 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00064 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

RNASEH2A
NM_006397.3 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.345

Variant links:

Genes affected

RNASEH2A (HGNC:18518): (ribonuclease H2 subunit A) The protein encoded by this gene is a component of the heterotrimeric type II ribonuclease H enzyme (RNAseH2). RNAseH2 is the major source of ribonuclease H activity in mammalian cells and endonucleolytically cleaves ribonucleotides. It is predicted to remove Okazaki fragment RNA primers during lagging strand DNA synthesis and to excise single ribonucleotides from DNA-DNA duplexes. Mutations in this gene cause Aicardi-Goutieres Syndrome (AGS), a an autosomal recessive neurological disorder characterized by progressive microcephaly and psychomotor retardation, intracranial calcifications, elevated levels of interferon-alpha and white blood cells in the cerebrospinal fluid.[provided by RefSeq, Aug 2009]

RNASEH2A links:

RNASEH2A (HGNC:):

RNASEH2A links:

THSD8 (HGNC:53785): (thrombospondin type 1 domain containing 8)

THSD8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.

PM1

In a domain RNase H type-2 (size 222) in uniprot entity RNH2A_HUMAN there are 12 pathogenic changes around while only 4 benign (75%) in NM_006397.3

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010812551).

BP6

Variant 19-12813107-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-12813107-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 328294.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr19-12813107-A-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.000642 (938/1461872) while in subpopulation MID AF= 0.00433 (25/5768). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00301. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 529 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RNASEH2A	NM_006397.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.662A>G	p.Lys221Arg	missense_variant	7/8	ENST00000221486.6	NP_006388.2	O75792

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
RNASEH2A	ENST00000221486.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.662A>G	p.Lys221Arg	missense_variant	7/8	1	NM_006397.3	ENSP00000221486.4		O75792

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000724

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.0127

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000956

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000641

AC:

161

AN:

251354

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000736

AC XY:

100

AN XY:

135862

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0000615

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000174

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.0000993

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00261

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000581

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000978

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000642

AC:

938

AN:

1461872

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000727

AC XY:

529

AN XY:

727232

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000119

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000291

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000115

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0000252

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00252

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000187

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000558

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000894

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000479

AC:

AN:

152296

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000537

AC XY:

AN XY:

74464

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.0000722

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00118

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000500

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000946

Alfa

AF:

0.000621

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000552

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00135

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000519

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000465

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000725

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000866

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000818

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome 4

Benign:4

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina	Jan 13, 2018	This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp	Jan 31, 2024	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	Sep 21, 2015	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	Dec 07, 2014	- -

not provided

Benign:3

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Nov 01, 2024	RNASEH2A: BP4 -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	not provided	Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)	-	- -

RNASEH2A-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Feb 14, 2022

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.057

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.49

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.48

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.36

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.23

Eigen

Benign

-1.4

Eigen_PC

Benign

-1.4

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.27

LIST_S2

Benign

0.82

M_CAP

Benign

0.037

MetaRNN

Benign

0.011

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.75

MutationAssessor

Benign

-0.34

PrimateAI

Benign

0.21

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.38

REVEL

Benign

0.25

Sift

Benign

0.70

Sift4G

Benign

0.57

Polyphen

0.0010

Vest4

0.12

MVP

0.62

MPC

0.17

ClinPred

0.0072

GERP RS

-4.8

Varity_R

0.084

gMVP

0.42

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.020

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over