rs143713841

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_002547.3(OPHN1):​c.2029C>A​(p.Leu677Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0016 in 1,207,637 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. There are 653 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 0 hom., 43 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0016 ( 3 hom. 610 hem. )

Consequence

OPHN1
NM_002547.3 missense

Scores

1
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.570
Variant links:
Genes affected
OPHN1 (HGNC:8148): (oligophrenin 1) This gene encodes a Rho-GTPase-activating protein that promotes GTP hydrolysis of Rho subfamily members. Rho proteins are important mediators of intracellular signal transduction, which affects cell migration and cell morphogenesis. Mutations in this gene are responsible for OPHN1-related X-linked cognitive disability with cerebellar hypoplasia and distinctive facial dysmorhphism. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.007971048).
BP6
Variant X-68063983-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-68063983-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 94074.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chrX-68063983-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 43 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
OPHN1NM_002547.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.2029C>A p.Leu677Met missense_variant 21/25 ENST00000355520.6 NP_002538.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
OPHN1ENST00000355520.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.2029C>A p.Leu677Met missense_variant 21/251 NM_002547.3 ENSP00000347710 P1O60890-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00116
AC:
128
AN:
110134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00133
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
32354
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000232
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000193
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00220
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00125
AC:
227
AN:
181757
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00131
AC XY:
87
AN XY:
66341
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000696
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000537
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00208
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00112
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00164
AC:
1799
AN:
1097450
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00168
AC XY:
610
AN XY:
362844
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000114
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000597
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.0000517
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000371
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00143
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00116
AC:
128
AN:
110187
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
0.00133
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
32417
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000232
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000192
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00220
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00157
Hom.:
66
Bravo
AF:
0.00108
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00135
AC:
5
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00173
AC:
5
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00268
AC:
18
ExAC
AF:
0.00124
AC:
150

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 20, 2014- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpDec 22, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and ClinicsFeb 18, 2016- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenetic Services Laboratory, University of ChicagoJun 12, 2019- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxSep 04, 2015This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsAug 18, 2017This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
See cases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratorio de Genetica e Diagnostico Molecular, Hospital Israelita Albert EinsteinMar 11, 2020ACMG classification criteria: BS1, BP4 -
OPHN1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJul 15, 2019This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.58
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
5.2
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.13
T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.57
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0049
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0080
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.0
M
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.16
N
REVEL
Benign
0.030
Sift
Benign
0.094
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.20
T
Polyphen
0.028
B
Vest4
0.097
MVP
0.27
MPC
0.13
ClinPred
0.018
T
GERP RS
1.2
Varity_R
0.10
gMVP
0.12

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143713841; hg19: chrX-67283825; API