rs143793213
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 2P and 17B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1
The ENST00000242480.4(EGR2):c.174C>T(p.Gly58=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000294 in 1,614,000 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00023 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00030 ( 1 hom. )
Consequence
EGR2
ENST00000242480.4 synonymous
ENST00000242480.4 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.17
Genes affected
EGR2 (HGNC:3239): (early growth response 2) The protein encoded by this gene is a transcription factor with three tandem C2H2-type zinc fingers. Defects in this gene are associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D (CMT1D), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4E (CMT4E), and with Dejerine-Sottas syndrome (DSS). Multiple transcript variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.48).
BP6
Variant 10-62814464-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr10-62814464-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 246185.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.17 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00023 (35/152188) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000382 (26/68004). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000267. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 12 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGR2 | NM_000399.5 | c.174C>T | p.Gly58= | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | ENST00000242480.4 | NP_000390.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EGR2 | ENST00000242480.4 | c.174C>T | p.Gly58= | synonymous_variant | 2/2 | 1 | NM_000399.5 | ENSP00000242480 | A1 | |
ENST00000493899.2 | n.655C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 8/8 | 5 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152070Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
152070
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000398 AC: 100AN: 251360Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000427 AC XY: 58AN XY: 135878
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
100
AN:
251360
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
58
AN XY:
135878
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000301 AC: 440AN: 1461812Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000305 AC XY: 222AN XY: 727204
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
440
AN:
1461812
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
222
AN XY:
727204
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152188Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000161 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74416
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
152188
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74416
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Sep 01, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Jun 01, 2021 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 28, 2021 | - - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1D Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, type I Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at