rs143840033

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001243133.2(NLRP3):​c.930C>T​(p.Asp310Asp) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000772 in 1,614,030 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00081 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00077 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

NLRP3
NM_001243133.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:13O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.27
Variant links:
Genes affected
NLRP3 (HGNC:16400): (NLR family pyrin domain containing 3) This gene encodes a pyrin-like protein containing a pyrin domain, a nucleotide-binding site (NBS) domain, and a leucine-rich repeat (LRR) motif. This protein interacts with the apoptosis-associated speck-like protein PYCARD/ASC, which contains a caspase recruitment domain, and is a member of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex. This complex functions as an upstream activator of NF-kappaB signaling, and it plays a role in the regulation of inflammation, the immune response, and apoptosis. The SARS-CoV 3a protein, a transmembrane pore-forming viroporin, has been shown to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome via the formation of ion channels in macrophages. Mutations in this gene are associated with familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS), Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS), chronic infantile neurological cutaneous and articular (CINCA) syndrome, neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID), keratoendotheliitis fugax hereditarian, and deafness, autosomal dominant 34, with or without inflammation. Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. Alternative 5' UTR structures are suggested by available data; however, insufficient evidence is available to determine if all of the represented 5' UTR splice patterns are biologically valid. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 1-247424379-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-247424379-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 97986.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-247424379-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.27 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000808 (123/152162) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00213 (11/5172). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00119. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 57 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 123 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NLRP3NM_001243133.2 linkc.930C>T p.Asp310Asp synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 ENST00000336119.8 NP_001230062.1 Q96P20A0A7I2R3P8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NLRP3ENST00000336119.8 linkc.930C>T p.Asp310Asp synonymous_variant Exon 4 of 10 1 NM_001243133.2 ENSP00000337383.4 A0A7I2R3P8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000802
AC:
122
AN:
152044
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000959
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00120
AC:
300
AN:
250984
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00114
AC XY:
155
AN XY:
135684
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000247
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000318
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00836
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000294
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000462
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00107
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00131
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000768
AC:
1123
AN:
1461868
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
43
AF XY:
0.000792
AC XY:
576
AN XY:
727234
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000149
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000402
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00765
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00191
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000336
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000589
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00179
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000808
AC:
123
AN:
152162
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000766
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74408
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00720
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00213
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000415
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00104
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000949
Alfa
AF:
0.00157
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000899
EpiCase
AF:
0.00174
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:13Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:7
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 05, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

NLRP3: BP4, BP7 -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Sep 10, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome 1 Benign:1Other:1
-
Unité médicale des maladies autoinflammatoires, CHRU Montpellier
Significance: not provided
Review Status: no classification provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Mar 20, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not specified Benign:1
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cryopyrin associated periodic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Familial amyloid nephropathy with urticaria AND deafness Benign:1
Mar 20, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Autoinflammatory syndrome Benign:1
Feb 26, 2021
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Chronic infantile neurological, cutaneous and articular syndrome Benign:1
Mar 20, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.31
DANN
Benign
0.29

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143840033; hg19: chr1-247587681; API