rs143847495

Positions:

chr20-32801423-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 2P and 8B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_006892.4(DNMT3B):c.2142G>A(p.Leu714=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000661 in 1,613,904 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00069 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

DNMT3B
NM_006892.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.146

Variant links:

Genes affected

DNMT3B (HGNC:2979): (DNA methyltransferase 3 beta) CpG methylation is an epigenetic modification that is important for embryonic development, imprinting, and X-chromosome inactivation. Studies in mice have demonstrated that DNA methylation is required for mammalian development. This gene encodes a DNA methyltransferase which is thought to function in de novo methylation, rather than maintenance methylation. The protein localizes primarily to the nucleus and its expression is developmentally regulated. Mutations in this gene cause the immunodeficiency-centromeric instability-facial anomalies (ICF) syndrome. Eight alternatively spliced transcript variants have been described. The full length sequences of variants 4 and 5 have not been determined. [provided by RefSeq, May 2011]

DNMT3B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 20-32801423-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr20-32801423-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 530713.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr20-32801423-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.146 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000407 (62/152178) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000647 (44/68036). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000495. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 34 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
DNMT3B	NM_006892.4 linkuse as main transcript	c.2142G>A	p.Leu714=	synonymous_variant	19/23	ENST00000328111.6	NP_008823.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
DNMT3B	ENST00000328111.6 linkuse as main transcript	c.2142G>A	p.Leu714=	synonymous_variant	19/23	1	NM_006892.4	ENSP00000328547	A2	Q9UBC3-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000407

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000647

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000402

AC:

101

AN:

251442

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000397

AC XY:

AN XY:

135904

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000554

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000747

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000687

AC:

1004

AN:

1461726

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000659

AC XY:

479

AN XY:

727164

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.0000598

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000955

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000824

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000580

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000407

AC:

AN:

152178

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000457

AC XY:

AN XY:

74336

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000265

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000647

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.000478

Alfa

AF:

0.000578

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000370

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000652

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht	-	- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided	clinical testing	Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center	-	- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter	clinical testing	CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen	Mar 01, 2022	DNMT3B: BP4, BP7 -

Immunodeficiency-centromeric instability-facial anomalies syndrome 1

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

DNMT3B-related disorder

Benign:1

Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided

clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Mar 09, 2021

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Centromeric instability of chromosomes 1,9 and 16 and immunodeficiency

Benign:1

Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Jan 31, 2024

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

6.1

DANN

Benign

0.76

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over