Menu
GeneBe

rs143863631

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_015272.5(RPGRIP1L):c.1810G>A(p.Glu604Lys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000548 in 1,612,524 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E604E) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00041 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00056 ( 7 hom. )

Consequence

RPGRIP1L
NM_015272.5 missense

Scores

2
13
3

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:8B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.54
Variant links:
Genes affected
RPGRIP1L (HGNC:29168): (RPGRIP1 like) The protein encoded by this gene can localize to the basal body-centrosome complex or to primary cilia and centrosomes in ciliated cells. The encoded protein has been found to interact with nephrocystin-4. Defects in this gene are a cause of Joubert syndrome type 7 (JBTS7) and Meckel syndrome type 5 (MKS5). [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.019843072).
BP6
Variant 16-53652877-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-53652877-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 289611.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Uncertain_significance=7}. Variant chr16-53652877-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000407 (62/152270) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00425 (22/5182). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00287. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 34 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RPGRIP1LNM_015272.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810G>A p.Glu604Lys missense_variant 15/27 ENST00000647211.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RPGRIP1LENST00000647211.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1810G>A p.Glu604Lys missense_variant 15/27 NM_015272.5 Q68CZ1-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152152
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000724
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00424
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000404
AC:
101
AN:
249866
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000356
AC XY:
48
AN XY:
134982
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000204
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00380
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00180
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.0000996
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0000927
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000132
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000493
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000562
AC:
821
AN:
1460254
Hom.:
7
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000536
AC XY:
389
AN XY:
726314
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000135
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00445
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000466
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000936
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000155
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000407
AC:
62
AN:
152270
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000457
AC XY:
34
AN XY:
74450
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000722
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000262
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00432
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00425
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000250
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000454
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000295
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000349
AC:
3
ExAC
AF:
0.000338
AC:
41
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00115
AC:
4
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000327
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:8Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxOct 17, 2018A variant of uncertain significance has been identified in the RPGRIP1L gene. The E604K variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The E604K variant is observed in 19/8640 (0.2%) alleles from individuals of East Asian background (Lek et al., 2016; 1000 Genomes Consortium et al., 2015; Exome Variant Server). The E604K variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is conserved in mammals; however, Lysine is observed at this position in evolution. In silico analysis predicts this variant is probably damaging to the protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Aug 18, 2016- -
RPGRIP1L-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesNov 28, 2023The RPGRIP1L c.1810G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Glu604Lys. This variant has been reported in the homozygous state in a patient with nephronophthisis-related ciliopathy, although pathogenicity was not determined (Kawaguchi et al. 2018. PubMed ID: 29991045). This variant is reported in 0.38% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org, v2.1.1). In gnomAD v4.0.0, this variant has been documented in seven homozygous individuals. This variant has conflicting interpretations in ClinVar ranging from likely benign to uncertain (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/289611/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Joubert syndrome 7 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 5 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Meckel syndrome, type 5;C1969053:Joubert syndrome 7;C5435651:COACH syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsOct 31, 2018- -
Nephronophthisis 8 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
Familial aplasia of the vermis Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Jul 24, 2020- -
Meckel-Gruber syndrome;C0431399:Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 21, 2022This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.43
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
Cadd
Uncertain
24
Dann
Pathogenic
1.0
Eigen
Uncertain
0.63
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.59
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.95
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;.;D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.20
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.020
T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.69
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.8
M;M;.;M;.;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.54
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.7
D;.;.;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.60
Sift
Pathogenic
0.0
D;.;.;D;D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.013
D;.;D;D;D;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;D;.;D;.;.
Vest4
0.77
MVP
0.77
MPC
0.44
ClinPred
0.12
T
GERP RS
4.5
Varity_R
0.68
gMVP
0.86

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs143863631; hg19: chr16-53686789; COSMIC: COSV50908535; COSMIC: COSV50908535; API