rs143947839
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4BA1BP7
This summary comes from the ClinGen Evidence Repository: This synonymous variant has a MAF of 0.002828 (0.2828%, 61/21570, 43140 alleles) in the African (gnomAD) cohort is ≥ 0.0015 (0.15%) (BA1). It is predicted by SSF and MES to lead to either an increase in the canonical splice site score or a decrease of the canonical splice site score by no more than 10% and no putative cryptic splice sites are created; in addition, evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms predict the site as not being highly conserved (PhyloP score -0.12 < 0.1 [-14.1;6.4]) (BP4+BP7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel for RUNX1: BA1, BP4, and BP7. LINK:https://erepo.genome.network/evrepo/ui/classification/CA10014207/MONDO:0011071/008
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001754.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUNX1 | NM_001754.5 | c.1086G>C | p.Ser362= | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000675419.1 | NP_001745.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RUNX1 | ENST00000675419.1 | c.1086G>C | p.Ser362= | synonymous_variant | 9/9 | NM_001754.5 | ENSP00000501943 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000704 AC: 107AN: 152052Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000195 AC: 41AN: 210562Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000167 AC XY: 19AN XY: 114104
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000825 AC: 119AN: 1442658Hom.: 1 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.0000852 AC XY: 61AN XY: 715766
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000703 AC: 107AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000591 AC XY: 44AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Hereditary thrombocytopenia and hematological cancer predisposition syndrome associated with RUNX1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 15, 2023 | - - |
Benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | ClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel | Jan 13, 2020 | This synonymous variant has a MAF of 0.002828 (0.2828%, 61/21570, 43140 alleles) in the African (gnomAD) cohort is =/> 0.0015 (0.15%) (BA1). It is predicted by SSF and MES to lead to either an increase in the canonical splice site score or a decrease of the canonical splice site score by no more than 10% and no putative cryptic splice sites are created; in addition, evolutionary conservation prediction algorithms predict the site as not being highly conserved (PhyloP score -0.12 < 0.1 [-14.1;6.4]) (BP4+BP7). In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as benign. ACMG/AMP criteria applied, as specified by the ClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel for RUNX1: BA1, BP4, and BP7. - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 20, 2017 | - - |
RUNX1-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Jul 02, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | curation | Sema4, Sema4 | Dec 07, 2020 | - - |
Acute myeloid leukemia Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at