rs144001451
Positions:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6BP7
The NM_001369.3(DNAH5):c.8940C>T(p.Ile2980=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000127 in 1,613,612 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.00013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 0 hom. )
Consequence
DNAH5
NM_001369.3 synonymous
NM_001369.3 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.08
Genes affected
DNAH5 (HGNC:2950): (dynein axonemal heavy chain 5) This gene encodes a dynein protein, which is part of a microtubule-associated motor protein complex consisting of heavy, light, and intermediate chains. This protein is an axonemal heavy chain dynein. It functions as a force-generating protein with ATPase activity, whereby the release of ADP is thought to produce the force-producing power stroke. Mutations in this gene cause primary ciliary dyskinesia type 3, as well as Kartagener syndrome, which are both diseases due to ciliary defects. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.
PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 5-13780840-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-13780840-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 414349.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.08 with no splicing effect.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | NM_001369.3 | c.8940C>T | p.Ile2980= | synonymous_variant | 53/79 | ENST00000265104.5 | NP_001360.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNAH5 | ENST00000265104.5 | c.8940C>T | p.Ile2980= | synonymous_variant | 53/79 | 1 | NM_001369.3 | ENSP00000265104 | P4 | |
DNAH5 | ENST00000681290.1 | c.8895C>T | p.Ile2965= | synonymous_variant | 53/79 | ENSP00000505288 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152176Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152176
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000219 AC: 55AN: 250804Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.000243 AC XY: 33AN XY: 135528
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
55
AN:
250804
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
33
AN XY:
135528
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000127 AC: 185AN: 1461318Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000129 AC XY: 94AN XY: 726964
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
185
AN:
1461318
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
94
AN XY:
726964
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000131 AC: 20AN: 152294Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000940 AC XY: 7AN XY: 74480
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
20
AN:
152294
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
74480
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
EpiCase
AF:
EpiControl
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:2
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 24, 2024 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 24, 2016 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 3 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at