rs144041999
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004281.4(BAG3):āc.187C>Gā(p.Pro63Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000764 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004281.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | NM_004281.4 | c.187C>G | p.Pro63Ala | missense_variant | 2/4 | ENST00000369085.8 | NP_004272.2 | |
BAG3 | XM_005270287.2 | c.187C>G | p.Pro63Ala | missense_variant | 2/4 | XP_005270344.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAG3 | ENST00000369085.8 | c.187C>G | p.Pro63Ala | missense_variant | 2/4 | 1 | NM_004281.4 | ENSP00000358081 | P1 | |
BAG3 | ENST00000450186.1 | c.13C>G | p.Pro5Ala | missense_variant | 3/5 | 5 | ENSP00000410036 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00308 AC: 469AN: 152228Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00136 AC: 342AN: 251220Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00120 AC XY: 163AN XY: 135804
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000523 AC: 765AN: 1461816Hom.: 8 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000560 AC XY: 407AN XY: 727212
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00308 AC: 469AN: 152346Hom.: 2 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00264 AC XY: 197AN XY: 74494
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Mar 19, 2012 | p.Pro63Ala in Exon 02 of BAG3: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 1.0% (39/3738) of African American c hromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http:/ /evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs144041999). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+ | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 03, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 16, 2017 | Variant summary: The BAG3 c.187C>G (p.Pro63Ala) variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. 4/5 in silico tools predict benign outcome for this variant. This variant was found in 191/121304 control chromosomes (2 homozygotes), predominantly observed in the African subpopulation at a frequency of 0.011019 (114/10346). This frequency is about 282 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic BAG3 variant (0.0000391), suggesting this is likely a benign polymorphism found primarily in the populations of African origin. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, nor has it been evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Oct 16, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | May 16, 2023 | - - |
Atrial fibrillation Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San Diego | Apr 17, 2019 | - - |
Myofibrillar myopathy 6;C3151293:Dilated cardiomyopathy 1HH Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 20, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at