rs144050370

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PP3_ModerateBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_002609.4(PDGFRB):​c.1978C>A​(p.Pro660Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000297 in 1,613,942 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000031 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PDGFRB
NM_002609.4 missense

Scores

9
8
2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter P:1U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.94
Variant links:
Genes affected
PDGFRB (HGNC:8804): (platelet derived growth factor receptor beta) The protein encoded by this gene is a cell surface tyrosine kinase receptor for members of the platelet-derived growth factor family. These growth factors are mitogens for cells of mesenchymal origin. The identity of the growth factor bound to a receptor monomer determines whether the functional receptor is a homodimer (PDGFB or PDGFD) or a heterodimer (PDGFA and PDGFB). This gene is essential for normal development of the cardiovascular system and aids in rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton. This gene is flanked on chromosome 5 by the genes for granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and macrophage-colony stimulating factor receptor; all three genes may be implicated in the 5-q syndrome. A translocation between chromosomes 5 and 12, that fuses this gene to that of the ETV6 gene, results in chronic myeloproliferative disorder with eosinophilia. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PP3
MetaRNN computational evidence supports a deleterious effect, 0.938
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000315 (46/1461724) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.0000396 (44/1111880). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00003. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 24 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAdExome4 at 46 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PDGFRBNM_002609.4 linkc.1978C>A p.Pro660Thr missense_variant Exon 14 of 23 ENST00000261799.9 NP_002600.1 P09619-1Q59F04
PDGFRBNM_001355016.2 linkc.1786C>A p.Pro596Thr missense_variant Exon 13 of 22 NP_001341945.1
PDGFRBNM_001355017.2 linkc.1495C>A p.Pro499Thr missense_variant Exon 14 of 23 NP_001341946.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PDGFRBENST00000261799.9 linkc.1978C>A p.Pro660Thr missense_variant Exon 14 of 23 1 NM_002609.4 ENSP00000261799.4 P09619-1
PDGFRBENST00000520579.5 linkn.*1292C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 14 of 23 1 ENSP00000430026.1 E5RH16
PDGFRBENST00000520579.5 linkn.*1292C>A 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 14 of 23 1 ENSP00000430026.1 E5RH16
PDGFRBENST00000520229.1 linkn.613C>A non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 2 of 2 3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000119
AC:
3
AN:
251166
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000147
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
135782
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000315
AC:
46
AN:
1461724
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000330
AC XY:
24
AN XY:
727184
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000396
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000131
AC:
2
AN:
152218
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000134
AC XY:
1
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000688
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000113
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.00000824
AC:
1

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Pathogenic:1Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Myofibromatosis, infantile, 1 Pathogenic:1
Jun 06, 2013
OMIM
Significance: Pathogenic
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: literature only

- -

Infantile myofibromatosis;C1866182:Acroosteolysis-keloid-like lesions-premature aging syndrome;C3554321:Basal ganglia calcification, idiopathic, 4;C4225270:Skeletal overgrowth-craniofacial dysmorphism-hyperelastic skin-white matter lesions syndrome Uncertain:1
Apr 23, 2021
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. Experimental studies have shown that this variant does not substantially affect PDGFRB protein function (PMID: 26455322). This variant has been observed in individual(s) with infantile myofibromatosis (PMID: 23731542). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 55849). This variant is present in population databases (rs144050370, ExAC 0.002%). This sequence change replaces proline with threonine at codon 660 of the PDGFRB protein (p.Pro660Thr). The proline residue is highly conserved and there is a small physicochemical difference between proline and threonine. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Pathogenic
0.77
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.16
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.060
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.82
D
Eigen
Uncertain
0.60
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.63
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.98
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.95
D
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.47
D
MetaRNN
Pathogenic
0.94
D
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.62
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.1
L
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.86
D
PROVEAN
Pathogenic
-5.0
D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.65
Sift
Uncertain
0.0030
D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.0080
D
Polyphen
1.0
D
Vest4
0.75
MVP
0.79
MPC
1.2
ClinPred
0.98
D
GERP RS
5.2
Varity_R
0.62
gMVP
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144050370; hg19: chr5-149503858; API