rs144072210
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 1P and 4B. PP2BP4_Strong
The NM_000552.5(VWF):c.5851A>G(p.Thr1951Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000437 in 1,611,706 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000552.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hereditary von Willebrand diseaseInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- von Willebrand disease type 2BInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease 2Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
- von Willebrand disease 1Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease type 2AInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease type 2MInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease 3Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- von Willebrand disease type 2NInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000532 AC: 81AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000558 AC: 138AN: 247230 AF XY: 0.000547 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000428 AC: 624AN: 1459526Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000433 AC XY: 314AN XY: 725884 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000532 AC: 81AN: 152180Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000457 AC XY: 34AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
- -
Reported in association with von Willebrand disease in the published literature (PMID: 21534937, 33556167, 31249928); In silico analysis indicates that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21534937, 34426522, 31064749, 31249928, 33556167, 29590070) -
von Willebrand disease type 1 Uncertain:2
- -
Criteria applied: PS4_SUP,PP2 -
Abnormality of coagulation Pathogenic:1
- -
not specified Uncertain:1
Variant summary: VWF c.5851A>G (p.Thr1951Ala) results in a non-conservative amino acid change located in the von Willebrand factor, type D domain (IPR001846) of the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00065 in 278632 control chromosomes (gnomAD), predominantly at a frequency of 0.0011 within the Non-Finnish European subpopulation in the gnomAD database. c.5851A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with Von Willebrand Disease (Kakela_2006, Johansson_2011, Bastarache_2018, Downes_2019, Sadler_2021). The variant was also found occuring in unaffected family members (Kakela_2006) and in unrelated individuals without disease (Sadler_2021). These data indicate that the variant may be associated with disease. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Four ClinVar submitters have assessed the variant since 2014: one classified the variant as likely pathogenic and three as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as VUS-possibly pathogenic. -
von Willebrand disease type 2 Uncertain:1
- -
von Willebrand disease type 3 Uncertain:1
- -
Hereditary von Willebrand disease Uncertain:1
Based on the classification scheme VCGS_Germline_v1.3.4, this variant is classified as VUS. Following criteria are met: 0103 - Dominant negative and loss of function are known mechanisms of disease in this gene and are associated with von Willebrand disease (VWD) (OMIM). (I) 0108 - This gene is associated with both recessive and dominant disease. VWD can be both dominantly and recessively inherited, and is categorised into 6 different types: 1 (MIM#193400), 2A, 2B, 2M, 2N (MIM#613554) and 3 (MIM#277480). (I) 0112 - The condition associated with this gene has incomplete penetrance (PMID: 19372260). (I) 0115 - Variants in this gene are known to have variable expressivity. (I) 0200 - Variant is predicted to result in a missense amino acid change from threonine to alanine. (I) 0251 - This variant is heterozygous. (I) 0302 - Variant is present in gnomAD (v2) <0.001 for a dominant condition (182 heterozygotes, 0 homozygotes). (SP) 0309 - An alternative amino acid change at the same position has been observed in gnomAD (v2) (1 heterozygote, 0 homozygotes). (I) 0503 - Missense variant consistently predicted to be tolerated by multiple in silico tools or not conserved in placental mammals with a minor amino acid change. (SB) 0600 - Variant is located in the annotated von Willebrand factor type D domain (PDB). (I) 0705 - No comparable missense variants have previous evidence for pathogenicity. (I) 0808 - Previous reports of pathogenicity for this variant are conflicting. This variant has been reported multiple times as a VUS, once as likely benign and once as likely pathogenic. It has been observed in a patient with type I VWD and another with a bleeding disorder cohort (ClinVar, LOVD, PMID: 31064749, PMID: 29590070, PMID: 31249928). (I) 1208 - Inheritance information for this variant is not currently available in this individual. (I) Legend: (SP) - Supporting pathogenic, (I) - Information, (SB) - Supporting benign -
von Willebrand disease type 1;C1264041:von Willebrand disease type 3 Uncertain:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at