Menu
GeneBe

rs144077436

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_018139.3(DNAAF2):c.1584T>A(p.Asn528Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000906 in 1,613,980 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 12 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. N528H) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00093 ( 12 hom. )

Consequence

DNAAF2
NM_018139.3 missense

Scores

3
16

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.102
Variant links:
Genes affected
DNAAF2 (HGNC:20188): (dynein axonemal assembly factor 2) This gene encodes a highly conserved protein involved in the preassembly of dynein arm complexes which power cilia. These complexes are found in some cilia and are assembled in the cytoplasm prior to transport for cilia formation. Mutations in this gene have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008465558).
BP6
Variant 14-49633566-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr14-49633566-A-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193393.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=1, Benign=2, Likely_benign=2}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000663 (101/152308) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00497 (24/4828). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00343. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 57 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DNAAF2NM_018139.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1584T>A p.Asn528Lys missense_variant 1/3 ENST00000298292.13
DNAAF2NM_001083908.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.1584T>A p.Asn528Lys missense_variant 1/2
DNAAF2NM_001378453.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-288T>A 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DNAAF2ENST00000298292.13 linkuse as main transcriptc.1584T>A p.Asn528Lys missense_variant 1/31 NM_018139.3 P2Q9NVR5-1
DNAAF2ENST00000406043.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1584T>A p.Asn528Lys missense_variant 1/21 A2Q9NVR5-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000664
AC:
101
AN:
152190
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000169
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00316
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00140
AC:
352
AN:
250904
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00180
AC XY:
244
AN XY:
135676
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000616
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000434
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00308
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00647
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000856
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000931
AC:
1361
AN:
1461672
Hom.:
12
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00115
AC XY:
839
AN XY:
727120
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00314
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000504
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00660
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000535
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00111
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000663
AC:
101
AN:
152308
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000765
AC XY:
57
AN XY:
74476
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000168
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00346
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00497
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000794
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000473
Alfa
AF:
0.000982
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000502
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000227
AC:
1
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00128
AC:
11
ExAC
AF:
0.00148
AC:
180
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00173
AC:
6
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00153
EpiControl
AF:
0.00130

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 15, 2018This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeDec 22, 2023- -
Primary ciliary dyskinesia 10 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Mar 05, 2015- -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenNov 01, 2022DNAAF2: BP4, BS2 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.14
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.61
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.64
Cadd
Benign
6.3
Dann
Uncertain
0.98
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.084
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.76
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.77
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.089
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.50
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.015
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0085
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.0
M;M
MutationTaster
Benign
0.93
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.35
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.9
D;D
REVEL
Benign
0.029
Sift
Benign
0.050
D;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.091
T;T
Polyphen
0.42
B;P
Vest4
0.084
MutPred
0.45
Gain of catalytic residue at P523 (P = 0);Gain of catalytic residue at P523 (P = 0);
MVP
0.15
MPC
0.65
ClinPred
0.047
T
GERP RS
0.18
Varity_R
0.15
gMVP
0.41

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144077436; hg19: chr14-50100284; COSMIC: COSV53568456; COSMIC: COSV53568456; API