rs144128773
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1
The NM_001364171.2(ODAD1):c.2056G>A(p.Val686Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000122 in 1,612,798 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001364171.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- primary ciliary dyskinesia 20Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen
- primary ciliary dyskinesiaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ODAD1 | ENST00000674294.1 | c.2056G>A | p.Val686Ile | missense_variant | Exon 16 of 16 | NM_001364171.2 | ENSP00000501363.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000696 AC: 106AN: 152190Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000172 AC: 43AN: 249744 AF XY: 0.000141 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000616 AC: 90AN: 1460492Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000537 AC XY: 39AN XY: 726614 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000696 AC: 106AN: 152306Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000712 AC XY: 53AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Primary ciliary dyskinesia Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at