Menu
GeneBe

rs144182297

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_024513.4(FYCO1):c.3779C>G(p.Pro1260Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000412 in 1,612,564 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0024 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00021 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

FYCO1
NM_024513.4 missense

Scores

18

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.604
Variant links:
Genes affected
FYCO1 (HGNC:14673): (FYVE and coiled-coil domain autophagy adaptor 1) The gene encodes a Rab7 adapter protein that is implicated in the microtubule transport of autophagosomes. The encoded protein contains a RUN domain, a FYVE-type zinc finger domain, and Golgi dynamics (GOLD) domain. The encoded protein plays a role in microtubule plus end-directed transport of autophagic vesicles through interactions with the small GTPase Rab7, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate (PI3P), the autophagosome marker LC3, and the kinesin KIF5. Mutations in this gene are associated with inclusion body myositis (IBM) and autosomal recessive congenital cataracts (CATC2). [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.004392326).
BP6
Variant 3-45958428-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-45958428-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 468446.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0024 (365/152338) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00849 (353/41574). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00776. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 181 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
FYCO1NM_024513.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3779C>G p.Pro1260Arg missense_variant 13/18 ENST00000296137.7

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
FYCO1ENST00000296137.7 linkuse as main transcriptc.3779C>G p.Pro1260Arg missense_variant 13/181 NM_024513.4 P1Q9BQS8-1
FYCO1ENST00000433878.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.146C>G p.Pro49Arg missense_variant 1/72
FYCO1ENST00000438446.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.-209C>G 5_prime_UTR_variant 1/65

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00240
AC:
365
AN:
152220
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00852
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000458
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00191
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000605
AC:
151
AN:
249726
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000473
AC XY:
64
AN XY:
135198
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00842
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000319
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00000890
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000491
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000205
AC:
300
AN:
1460226
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000178
AC XY:
129
AN XY:
726414
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00748
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000313
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000540
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000448
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00240
AC:
365
AN:
152338
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00243
AC XY:
181
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00849
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.000457
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00189
Alfa
AF:
0.000308
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00263
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00567
AC:
25
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000700
AC:
85
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000577
AC:
2
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 18 Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeAug 10, 2023- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingFulgent Genetics, Fulgent GeneticsAug 06, 2021- -
FYCO1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesJun 08, 2020This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 31, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.072
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.59
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
Cadd
Benign
4.5
Dann
Benign
0.26
Eigen
Benign
-0.94
Eigen_PC
Benign
-1.0
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.21
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.55
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.0094
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0044
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.0
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.5
L;L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.25
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.2
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.096
Sift
Benign
0.35
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.27
T;T
Polyphen
0.25
.;B
Vest4
0.18
MVP
0.20
MPC
0.19
ClinPred
0.0044
T
GERP RS
-3.3
Varity_R
0.020
gMVP
0.49

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144182297; hg19: chr3-45999920; API