dbSNP rs1441952732: GDF15:p.His102Asn (chr19-18388312-C-A) – ACMG Classification: Uncertain_significance (0 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate

The NM_004864.4(GDF15):c.304C>A(p.His102Asn) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000686 in 1,458,344 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 6.9e-7 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

GDF15
NM_004864.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.823

Variant links:

Genes affected

GDF15 (HGNC:30142): (growth differentiation factor 15) This gene encodes a secreted ligand of the TGF-beta (transforming growth factor-beta) superfamily of proteins. Ligands of this family bind various TGF-beta receptors leading to recruitment and activation of SMAD family transcription factors that regulate gene expression. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed to generate each subunit of the disulfide-linked homodimer. The protein is expressed in a broad range of cell types, acts as a pleiotropic cytokine and is involved in the stress response program of cells after cellular injury. Increased protein levels are associated with disease states such as tissue hypoxia, inflammation, acute injury and oxidative stress. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2016]

GDF15 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.2091946).

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GDF15	NM_004864.4 link	c.304C>A	p.His102Asn	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2	ENST00000252809.3	NP_004855.2	Q99988

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
GDF15	ENST00000252809.3 link	c.304C>A	p.His102Asn	missense_variant	Exon 2 of 2	1	NM_004864.4	ENSP00000252809.3	Q99988
GDF15	ENST00000595973.3 link	c.304C>A	p.His102Asn	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 3	5		ENSP00000470531.3	Q99988A0A0A0MTT8
GDF15	ENST00000597765.2 link	c.304C>A	p.His102Asn	missense_variant	Exon 3 of 3	4		ENSP00000469819.2	Q99988
GDF15	ENST00000594925.1 link	n.122C>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00000413

AC:

AN:

242028

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

132806

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000561

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

6.86e-7

AC:

AN:

1458344

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00

AC XY:

AN XY:

725466

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000166

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1

Oct 10, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

The c.304C>A (p.H102N) alteration is located in exon 2 (coding exon 2) of the GDF15 gene. This alteration results from a C to A substitution at nucleotide position 304, causing the histidine (H) at amino acid position 102 to be replaced by an asparagine (N). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.20

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.20

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.91

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.10

T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.032

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.098

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.69

LIST_S2

Benign

0.51

T;T

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.14

MetaRNN

Benign

0.21

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.64

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.63

.;N

PrimateAI

Benign

0.47

PROVEAN

Benign

-1.0

.;N

REVEL

Benign

0.18

Sift

Benign

0.095

.;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.57

T;T

Polyphen

0.99

.;D

Vest4

0.30

MutPred

0.23

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0961);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0961);

MVP

0.79

MPC

0.69

ClinPred

0.21

GERP RS

3.0

Varity_R

0.19

gMVP

0.64

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over