Menu
GeneBe

rs144253015

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_005732.4(RAD50):c.3455G>A(p.Arg1152Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000577 in 1,611,972 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1152L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00022 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000040 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

RAD50
NM_005732.4 missense

Scores

1
4
7

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.59
Variant links:
Genes affected
RAD50 (HGNC:9816): (RAD50 double strand break repair protein) The protein encoded by this gene is highly similar to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad50, a protein involved in DNA double-strand break repair. This protein forms a complex with MRE11 and NBS1. The protein complex binds to DNA and displays numerous enzymatic activities that are required for nonhomologous joining of DNA ends. This protein, cooperating with its partners, is important for DNA double-strand break repair, cell cycle checkpoint activation, telomere maintenance, and meiotic recombination. Knockout studies of the mouse homolog suggest this gene is essential for cell growth and viability. Mutations in this gene are the cause of Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
TH2LCRR (HGNC:40495): (T helper type 2 locus control region associated RNA)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -3 ACMG points.

PM1
In a hotspot region, there are 2 aminoacids with missense pathogenic changes in the window of +-8 aminoacids around while only 1 benign, 16 uncertain in NM_005732.4
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.062730014).
BP6
Variant 5-132637180-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-132637180-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 128019.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Uncertain_significance=3, Likely_benign=3, Benign=1}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
RAD50NM_005732.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.3455G>A p.Arg1152Gln missense_variant 22/25 ENST00000378823.8
TH2LCRRNR_132124.1 linkuse as main transcriptn.153+978C>T intron_variant, non_coding_transcript_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
RAD50ENST00000378823.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.3455G>A p.Arg1152Gln missense_variant 22/251 NM_005732.4 P1Q92878-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000224
AC:
34
AN:
152024
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000821
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000954
AC:
24
AN:
251442
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000957
AC XY:
13
AN XY:
135888
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00129
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000404
AC:
59
AN:
1459830
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.0000358
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
726248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00108
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000448
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000153
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000664
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000223
AC:
34
AN:
152142
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000161
AC XY:
12
AN XY:
74352
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000819
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.0000757
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000348
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00250
AC:
11
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000123
AC:
15
EpiCase
AF:
0.0000546
EpiControl
AF:
0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 09, 2014RAD50 has only been recently described in association with cancer predisposition and the risks are not well understood.This variant is denoted RAD50 c.3455G>A at the cDNA level, p.Arg1152Gln (R1152Q) at the protein level, and results in the change of an Arginine to a Glutamine (CGA>CAA). This variant has not, to our knowledge, been published in the literature as pathogenic or benign. RAD50 Arg1152Gln was observed with an allele frequency of 0.2% (11/4406) in African Americans in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, which is not frequent enough to be considered a common benign variant. This variant is a semi-conservative substitution in which a positive polar amino acid is replaced with a neutral polar one, altering a position that is fully conserved throughout evolution and is not located in a known functional domain. In silico analyses are inconsistent with regard to the effect this variant may have on protein structure and function but lean toward benign. The currently available evidence about this variant does not allow us to predict whether RAD50 Arg1152Gln is a pathogenic variant or a benign variant, and it is therefore classified as having unknown significance. Furthermore, based on the currently available information, cancer risks associated with this variant, and the RAD50 gene, remain unclear. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJun 30, 2023- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsFeb 18, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 16, 2024- -
RAD50-related disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact SciencesSep 29, 2022The RAD50 c.3455G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Arg1152Gln. This variant was reported in an individual with breast or Lynch syndrome (Table S1 - Velázquez et al. 2020. PubMed ID: 32522261). This variant is reported in 0.11% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/5-131972872-G-A). In ClinVar this variant has conflicting interpretations of pathogenicity of benign, likely benign, and uncertain (https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/variation/128019/). Although we suspect that this variant may be benign, at this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -
Nijmegen breakage syndrome-like disorder Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submittercurationSema4, Sema4Aug 23, 2021- -
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpJan 22, 2022- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.34
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.044
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.12
Cadd
Pathogenic
27
Dann
Uncertain
1.0
Eigen
Benign
0.050
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.26
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
1.0
D
M_CAP
Benign
0.031
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.063
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.77
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.66
T
Polyphen
0.11
.;.;.;B
Vest4
0.82
MVP
0.60
ClinPred
0.16
T
GERP RS
5.9
Varity_R
0.24
gMVP
0.87

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144253015; hg19: chr5-131972872; COSMIC: COSV54757022; COSMIC: COSV54757022; API