rs144316388
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2
The NM_001379110.1(SLC9A6):c.474T>C(p.Ser158=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00112 in 1,176,895 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 17 homozygotes. There are 311 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.0062 ( 6 hom., 153 hem., cov: 22)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00060 ( 11 hom. 158 hem. )
Consequence
SLC9A6
NM_001379110.1 synonymous
NM_001379110.1 synonymous
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.208
Genes affected
SLC9A6 (HGNC:11079): (solute carrier family 9 member A6) This gene encodes a sodium-hydrogen exchanger that is amember of the solute carrier family 9. The encoded protein localizes to early and recycling endosomes and may be involved in regulating endosomal pH and volume. Defects in this gene are associated with X-linked syndromic cognitive disability, Christianson type. Alternate splicing results in multiple transcript variants.[provided by RefSeq, Apr 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.58).
BP6
?
Variant X-135998508-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-135998508-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 139200.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
?
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.208 with no splicing effect.
BS1
?
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00616 (681/110496) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0214 (651/30408). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.02. There are 6 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 153 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
?
High Homozygotes in GnomAd at 6 XL gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC9A6 | NM_001379110.1 | c.474T>C | p.Ser158= | synonymous_variant | 5/18 | ENST00000630721.3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLC9A6 | ENST00000630721.3 | c.474T>C | p.Ser158= | synonymous_variant | 5/18 | 4 | NM_001379110.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.00617 AC: 681AN: 110451Hom.: 6 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00468 AC XY: 153AN XY: 32715
GnomAD3 genomes
?
AF:
AC:
681
AN:
110451
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
32715
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00193 AC: 316AN: 163836Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.000933 AC XY: 52AN XY: 55714
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
316
AN:
163836
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
52
AN XY:
55714
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000603 AC: 643AN: 1066399Hom.: 11 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.000460 AC XY: 158AN XY: 343139
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
643
AN:
1066399
Hom.:
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
AC XY:
158
AN XY:
343139
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.00616 AC: 681AN: 110496Hom.: 6 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00467 AC XY: 153AN XY: 32770
GnomAD4 genome
?
AF:
AC:
681
AN:
110496
Hom.:
Cov.:
22
AF XY:
AC XY:
153
AN XY:
32770
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:5
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Mar 07, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 15, 2013 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 25, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
SLC9A6-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Apr 02, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Christianson syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at