rs144350008

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_017890.5(VPS13B):​c.7876G>A​(p.Glu2626Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000219 in 1,613,668 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

VPS13B
NM_017890.5 missense

Scores

3
8
8

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.60

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
VPS13B (HGNC:2183): (vacuolar protein sorting 13 homolog B) This gene encodes a potential transmembrane protein that may function in vesicle-mediated transport and sorting of proteins within the cell. This protein may play a role in the development and the function of the eye, hematological system, and central nervous system. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Cohen syndrome. Multiple splice variants encoding distinct isoforms have been identified for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
VPS13B Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Cohen syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.02662453).
BP6
Variant 8-99784336-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr8-99784336-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 286894.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000231 (338/1461396) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00811 (322/39692). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00738. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 157 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
VPS13BNM_017890.5 linkc.7876G>A p.Glu2626Lys missense_variant Exon 43 of 62 ENST00000358544.7 NP_060360.3 Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13BNM_152564.5 linkc.7801G>A p.Glu2601Lys missense_variant Exon 43 of 62 ENST00000357162.7 NP_689777.3 Q7Z7G8-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
VPS13BENST00000358544.7 linkc.7876G>A p.Glu2626Lys missense_variant Exon 43 of 62 1 NM_017890.5 ENSP00000351346.2 Q7Z7G8-1
VPS13BENST00000357162.7 linkc.7801G>A p.Glu2601Lys missense_variant Exon 43 of 62 1 NM_152564.5 ENSP00000349685.2 Q7Z7G8-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152154
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000655
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00289
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000367
AC:
92
AN:
250980
AF XY:
0.000288
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00501
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000231
AC:
338
AN:
1461396
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.000216
AC XY:
157
AN XY:
727022
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33432
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44712
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26114
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00811
AC:
322
AN:
39692
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86254
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
9.00e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1111658
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000249
AC:
15
AN:
60354
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.480
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
24
47
71
94
118
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
10
20
30
40
50
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000105
AC:
16
AN:
152272
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000121
AC XY:
9
AN XY:
74446
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41554
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000654
AC:
1
AN:
15296
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00290
AC:
15
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10618
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68012
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.519
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
2
3
5
6
8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000254
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000136
ExAC
AF:
0.000379
AC:
46
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cohen syndrome Benign:2
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Uncertain:1
May 17, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The E2626K variant has not been published as a pathogenic variant, nor has it been reported as a benign variant to our knowledge. The E2626K variant is observed in 87/18830 (0.5%) alleles from individuals of East Asian background (Lek et al., 2016). The E2626K variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. However, in-silico analyses, including protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, support that this variant does not alter protein structure/function. Therefore, based on the currently available information, it is unclear whether this variant is a pathogenic variant or a rare benign variant. -

not specified Benign:1
Mar 16, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

VPS13B-related disorder Benign:1
Mar 01, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.35
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.18
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
-0.030
CADD
Pathogenic
28
DANN
Pathogenic
1.0
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.11
.;T
Eigen
Pathogenic
0.79
Eigen_PC
Pathogenic
0.82
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.97
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.96
D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.032
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.027
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.48
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
.;M
PhyloP100
9.6
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.1
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.30
Sift
Benign
0.28
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.031
D;D
Polyphen
0.99
D;D
Vest4
0.78
MVP
0.81
MPC
0.24
ClinPred
0.17
T
GERP RS
5.7
Varity_R
0.32
gMVP
0.52
Mutation Taster
=40/60
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144350008; hg19: chr8-100796564; API