rs144427583

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_001003800.2(BICD2):c.1179T>A(p.Asn393Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000713 in 1,613,974 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00066 ( 1 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00072 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

BICD2
NM_001003800.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.93

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

BICD2 (HGNC:17208): (BICD cargo adaptor 2) This gene is one of two human homologs of Drosophila bicaudal-D and a member of the Bicoid family. It has been implicated in dynein-mediated, minus end-directed motility along microtubules. It has also been reported to be a phosphorylation target of NIMA related kinase 8. Two alternative splice variants have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

BICD2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy with contractures
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp

BICD2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.023813486).

BP6

Variant 9-92719466-A-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-92719466-A-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 474255.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000657 (100/152196) while in subpopulation AMR AF = 0.00274 (42/15306). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00209. There are 1 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 47 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 100 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
BICD2	NM_001003800.2 link	c.1179T>A	p.Asn393Lys	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 7	ENST00000356884.11	NP_001003800.1	Q8TD16-2Q96FU2
BICD2	NM_015250.4 link	c.1179T>A	p.Asn393Lys	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 8		NP_056065.1	Q8TD16-1Q96FU2
BICD2	XM_017014551.2 link	c.1260T>A	p.Asn420Lys	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 8		XP_016870040.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
BICD2	ENST00000356884.11 link	c.1179T>A	p.Asn393Lys	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 7	1	NM_001003800.2	ENSP00000349351.6		Q8TD16-2
BICD2	ENST00000375512.3 link	c.1179T>A	p.Asn393Lys	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 8	1		ENSP00000364662.3		Q8TD16-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000658

AC:

100

AN:

152078

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000966

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00275

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000706

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00144

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000733

AC:

184

AN:

250962

AF XY:

0.000685

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000247

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00162

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00228

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000231

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000776

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00131

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000718

AC:

1050

AN:

1461778

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000718

AC XY:

522

AN XY:

727198

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00157

AC:

AN:

44720

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00180

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000116

AC:

AN:

86250

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

53324

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000762

AC:

847

AN:

1112004

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00104

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

152

228

304

380

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

120

150

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000657

AC:

100

AN:

152196

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000632

AC XY:

AN XY:

74424

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000963

AC:

AN:

41516

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00274

AC:

AN:

15306

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3466

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5162

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000942

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000706

AC:

AN:

67994

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00142

AC:

AN:

2108

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.514

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000873

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000914

TwinsUK

AF:

0.000539

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.000778

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000454

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000675

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000927

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:7

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Feb 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

BICD2: BS2 -

Dec 18, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 02, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Feb 16, 2025

Laboratory of Genetics, Children's Clinical University Hospital Latvia

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Nov 27, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Autosomal dominant childhood-onset proximal spinal muscular atrophy with contractures

Benign:1

Jan 30, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

BICD2-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 19, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.27

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.50

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.51

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.28

.;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.34

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.26

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.89

LIST_S2

Benign

0.80

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.030

MetaRNN

Benign

0.024

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.9

L;L

PhyloP100

2.9

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.50

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.75

N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.030

Sift

Benign

0.44

T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.70

T;T

Polyphen

0.34

B;P

Vest4

0.66

MutPred

0.49

Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0429);Gain of MoRF binding (P = 0.0429);

MVP

0.63

MPC

0.65

ClinPred

0.0098

GERP RS

1.7

Varity_R

0.043

gMVP

0.36

Mutation Taster

=95/5

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over