rs144455066
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_012233.3(RAB3GAP1):c.2676G>T(p.Arg892Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000563 in 1,612,968 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R892G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_012233.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_012233.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RAB3GAP1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2676G>T | p.Arg892Ser | missense | Exon 23 of 24 | ENSP00000264158.8 | Q15042-1 | ||
| RAB3GAP1 | TSL:1 | c.2676G>T | p.Arg892Ser | missense | Exon 23 of 25 | ENSP00000411418.1 | Q15042-3 | ||
| ZRANB3 | TSL:1 | n.1793+480C>A | intron | N/A |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00276 AC: 420AN: 152116Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000785 AC: 197AN: 250994 AF XY: 0.000531 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000334 AC: 488AN: 1460734Hom.: 3 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000282 AC XY: 205AN XY: 726732 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00276 AC: 420AN: 152234Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00270 AC XY: 201AN XY: 74428 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at