rs144505461

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_057176.3(BSND):​c.189C>T​(p.Val63=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00199 in 1,614,204 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0015 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0020 ( 20 hom. )

Consequence

BSND
NM_057176.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -1.68
Variant links:
Genes affected
BSND (HGNC:16512): (barttin CLCNK type accessory subunit beta) This gene encodes an essential beta subunit for CLC chloride channels. These heteromeric channels localize to basolateral membranes of renal tubules and of potassium-secreting epithelia of the inner ear. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Bartter syndrome with sensorineural deafness. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).
BP6
Variant 1-55005033-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-55005033-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 46549.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-55005033-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-1.67 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00147 (224/152350) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00705 (34/4822). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00519. There are 2 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 106 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
BSNDNM_057176.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.189C>T p.Val63= synonymous_variant 2/4 ENST00000651561.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
BSNDENST00000651561.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.189C>T p.Val63= synonymous_variant 2/4 NM_057176.3 P1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00147
AC:
224
AN:
152232
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00705
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00334
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00252
AC:
633
AN:
251416
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00288
AC XY:
392
AN XY:
135882
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00286
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00466
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0000544
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00794
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00193
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00261
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00205
AC:
2995
AN:
1461854
Hom.:
20
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.00222
AC XY:
1611
AN XY:
727232
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000299
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00250
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00578
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00750
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000112
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00166
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00268
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00147
AC:
224
AN:
152350
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00142
AC XY:
106
AN XY:
74510
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000289
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00340
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00461
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00705
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00147
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00331
Alfa
AF:
0.00187
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.00175
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
11
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00218
EpiControl
AF:
0.00190

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingClinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMay 29, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingInvitaeJan 31, 2024- -
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht-- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenJan 01, 2023BSND: BP4, BP7, BS2 -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Sep 09, 2016- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJul 01, 2015p.Val63Val in exon 02 of BSND: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence, and has been identified in 0.7% of South Asian c hromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute .org; dbSNP rs144505461). -
Bartter disease type 4A Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGenome-Nilou LabJun 10, 2021- -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -
Bartter syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Oct 22, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.61
CADD
Benign
0.15
DANN
Benign
0.67

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144505461; hg19: chr1-55470706; API