rs144507279
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points: 2P and 0B. PM2
The NM_014846.4(WASHC5):c.2422A>T(p.Ile808Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000205 in 1,461,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. I808V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014846.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
- hereditary spastic paraplegia 8Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- Ritscher-Schinzel syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 2 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASHC5 | ENST00000318410.12 | c.2422A>T | p.Ile808Leu | missense_variant | Exon 20 of 29 | 1 | NM_014846.4 | ENSP00000318016.7 | ||
| WASHC5 | ENST00000517845.5 | c.1978A>T | p.Ile660Leu | missense_variant | Exon 18 of 27 | 2 | ENSP00000429676.1 | |||
| WASHC5 | ENST00000530856.1 | n.69A>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | Exon 2 of 3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000205 AC: 3AN: 1461732Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000275 AC XY: 2AN XY: 727184 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at