rs144507672

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BP7

The NM_017882.3(CLN6):c.585C>T(p.Gly195Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000122 in 1,613,758 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00011 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN6
NM_017882.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.10

Publications

2 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN6 (HGNC:2077): (CLN6 transmembrane ER protein) This gene is one of eight which have been associated with neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL). Also referred to as Batten disease, NCL comprises a class of autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative disorders affecting children. The genes responsible likely encode proteins involved in the degradation of post-translationally modified proteins in lysosomes. The primary defect in NCL disorders is thought to be associated with lysosomal storage function. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

CLN6 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Myriad Women’s Health, Orphanet
ceroid lipofuscinosis, neuronal, 6B (Kufs type)
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen

CLN6 links:

ENSG00000260007 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000260007 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.050184906).

BP6

Variant 15-68209717-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-68209717-G-A is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 136799.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=2.1 with no splicing effect.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN6	NM_017882.3 link	c.585C>T	p.Gly195Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	ENST00000249806.11	NP_060352.1	Q9NWW5-1A0A024R601
CLN6	NM_001411068.1 link	c.681C>T	p.Gly227Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7		NP_001397997.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN6	ENST00000249806.11 link	c.585C>T	p.Gly195Gly	synonymous_variant	Exon 6 of 7	1	NM_017882.3	ENSP00000249806.5		Q9NWW5-1
ENSG00000260007	ENST00000562767.2 link	c.84-12089C>T		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 2	3		ENSP00000456336.1		H3BRN7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00404

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000262

AC:

AN:

251432

AF XY:

0.000213

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000867

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00506

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000967

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000163

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000123

AC:

180

AN:

1461522

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000118

AC XY:

AN XY:

727068

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000299

AC:

AN:

33468

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000671

AC:

AN:

44718

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00451

AC:

118

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39696

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86238

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53362

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5596

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000315

AC:

AN:

1111946

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000381

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.472

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000112

AC:

AN:

152236

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

74368

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41456

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15290

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00404

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68048

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.516

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000275

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000136

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000349

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000239

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000164

EpiControl

AF:

0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 12, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Mar 11, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Apr 12, 2018

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.14

BayesDel_addAF

Pathogenic

0.25

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.32

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.83

LIST_S2

Benign

0.43

T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.038

MetaRNN

Benign

0.050

T;T

PhyloP100

2.1

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.87

N;.

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;.

Vest4

0.35

MVP

0.94

GERP RS

5.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=58/42

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.11

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over