rs144513217

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001040616.3(LINS1):c.1479T>C(p.Cys493Cys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000328 in 1,557,222 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00032 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

LINS1
NM_001040616.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.0820

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

LINS1 (HGNC:30922): (lines homolog 1) The Drosophila segment polarity gene lin encodes a protein, lines, which plays important roles in development of the epidermis and hindgut. This gene encodes a protein containing a lines-like domain. This gene is located on chromosome 15 and clustered with the gene encoding ankyrin repeat and SOCS box-containing protein 7. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2017]

LINS1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
intellectual disability, autosomal recessive 27
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
autosomal recessive non-syndromic intellectual disability
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

LINS1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).

BP6

Variant 15-100570033-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr15-100570033-A-G is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 435759.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.082 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population mid. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.000321 (451/1404860) while in subpopulation MID AF = 0.00344 (19/5518). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00225. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 229 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LINS1	NM_001040616.3 link	c.1479T>C	p.Cys493Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	ENST00000314742.13	NP_001035706.2	Q8NG48-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
LINS1	ENST00000314742.13 link	c.1479T>C	p.Cys493Cys	synonymous_variant	Exon 7 of 7	5	NM_001040616.3	ENSP00000318423.8	Q8NG48-1
LINS1	ENST00000559169.1 link	n.1754T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	2
LINS1	ENST00000561233.1 link	n.356T>C		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	3
LINS1	ENST00000560783.1 link	n.190+3618T>C		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 3	5		ENSP00000474128.1	S4R3B7

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000388

AC:

AN:

152244

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000482

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000916

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000529

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00239

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000358

AC:

AN:

206480

AF XY:

0.000420

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000182

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000596

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000801

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000321

AC:

451

AN:

1404860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000329

AC XY:

229

AN XY:

695744

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000953

AC:

AN:

31494

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000594

AC:

AN:

37026

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.0000419

AC:

AN:

23892

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39348

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000216

AC:

AN:

78602

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

40200

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00344

AC:

AN:

5518

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000315

AC:

344

AN:

1090508

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000772

AC:

AN:

58272

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.501

Heterozygous variant carriers

122

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000387

AC:

AN:

152362

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000362

AC XY:

AN XY:

74512

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000481

AC:

AN:

41582

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000914

AC:

AN:

15310

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5190

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000529

AC:

AN:

68034

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00237

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.513

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000898

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000446

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:3

Dec 31, 2019

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

LINS1: BP4, BP7 -

not specified

Benign:1

Sep 09, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Jan 20, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.56

CADD

Benign

5.4

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.66

PhyloP100

0.082

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over