rs144665682
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The ENST00000330817.11(ALG12):c.631C>T(p.Arg211Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0068 in 1,614,130 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 123 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. R211R) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000330817.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG12 | NM_024105.4 | c.631C>T | p.Arg211Cys | missense_variant | 5/10 | ENST00000330817.11 | NP_077010.1 | |
ALG12 | XM_017028936.2 | c.631C>T | p.Arg211Cys | missense_variant | 5/10 | XP_016884425.1 | ||
ALG12 | XM_017028937.2 | c.631C>T | p.Arg211Cys | missense_variant | 5/11 | XP_016884426.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALG12 | ENST00000330817.11 | c.631C>T | p.Arg211Cys | missense_variant | 5/10 | 1 | NM_024105.4 | ENSP00000333813 | P1 | |
ALG12 | ENST00000492791.1 | c.163C>T | p.Arg55Cys | missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 1/6 | 3 | ENSP00000417387 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00614 AC: 935AN: 152252Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00904 AC: 2271AN: 251096Hom.: 33 AF XY: 0.0101 AC XY: 1368AN XY: 135784
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00687 AC: 10037AN: 1461760Hom.: 111 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00765 AC XY: 5561AN XY: 727172
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00616 AC: 938AN: 152370Hom.: 12 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00643 AC XY: 479AN XY: 74510
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:5
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 12, 2022 | See Variant Classification Assertion Criteria. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | May 05, 2015 | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
ALG12-congenital disorder of glycosylation Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jul 30, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at